The main aim of this paper is to review recent studies over the past 10 years investigating the influencing factors for improving the mechanical properties of concrete. This focuses on concrete comprising of pozzolanic materials, partially or entirely replacing ordinary Portland cement, in the concrete mixture. Firstly, the effectiveness of main factors such as temperature, water to solid (W/S) ratio, and alkaline solution ratio was briefly discussed. Next, the effects of significant factors such as different superplasticizer and alkaline solutions and combinative materials on the improvement of concrete workability were reviewed and compared. Eventually, other concrete properties such as water absorption and durability were discussed in the last section. After reviewing all types of concrete additives, including mineral or chemical materials, the influence of these admixtures under different laboratory conditions were highlighted to objectively evaluate the benefits of each factor. As a whole, the significant reasons of such experimental tests arising from the usage of these materials, in accordance with the laboratory results obtained from these investigations, are discussed.
In this study, the compressive strength and the permeation properties of fly ash-based Geopolymer were experimentally investigated. Type 2 Portland cement (T2PC) was partially or entirely replaced with 0, 10, 20, 30, 50, 70, and 100% of fly ash (FA). The laboratory tests were conducted for compressive strength at 7, 28, and 90 days, and permeation properties such as water absorption at 7 and 28 days. The main goal was to produce eco-friendly concrete with high strength and low permeability through blending cementitious materials including low Calcium (Ca) (T2PC and FA) for protecting concrete against sulphate attacks and other chemically destructive compounds in the environment. This study focused on the effectiveness of the curing period, combinations of chemical activators by varying the molarity of alkaline solutions between 4.16 and 12.96 M and keeping the sodium silicate (SS) to sodium hydroxide (SH) by the weight ratio of 2.5. Lab observations from this study demonstrated that the compressive strength was enhanced with the increment in fly ash content at all ages, with optimum being at 20% as the replacement of T2PC.
In this paper, an evaluation based on the detailed failure has been conducted for underground sewage Geopolymer concrete (GPC) pipes under static and seismic loadings with consideration of the optimal time steps in the time-dependent process related to nonlinear behavior of GPC pipes in static and dynamic analyses. The ANSYS platform is employed for improving an advanced FE model for a GPC pipe which can simulate the performance of underground GPC pipes containing various percentages of fly ash (FA) as a Portland cement (PC) replacement. Subsequently, the time-dependent model is used to assess the efficacy of this concrete admixture (FA) in the structural response of the unreinforced GPC pipe in FEM. Indeed, the generated GPC pipe with the three-dimensional model has the potential to capture the nonlinear behavior of concrete which depicts the patterns of tensile cracking and compressive crushing that occur over the applied static loads in the FE model. The main issue in this paper is the assessment of the GPC pipe response typically based on the displacement due to static and seismic loadings. The numerical results demonstrated that the optimal displacement was obtained when the structural response had typically the lowest value for GPC pipes containing 10–30% FA and 20% FA under static and seismic loadings, respectively. Indeed, a reduction by 25% for the vertical displacement of a GPC pipe containing 20% FA was observed compared to that without FA under time-history analysis.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
customersupport@researchsolutions.com
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.