No abstract

Scientists from several institutions and with different research backgrounds have worked together to develop a prototype modular land model for weather forecasting and climate studies. This model is now available for public use and further development.C limate and weather forecasting models require the energy, water, and momentum fluxes across the land-atmosphere interface to be specified. Various land surface parameterizations (LSPs), ranging from the simple bucket-type LSP in the 1960s to the current soil-vegetation-atmosphere interactive LSP, have been developed in the past four decades to calculate these fluxes. The Project for Intercomparison of Land Surface Parameterization Schemes (PILPS) has demonstrated that, even with the same atmospheric forcing data and similar land surface parameters, different LSPs still give significantly different surface fluxes and soil wetness, partly because of the differences in the formulations of individual processes and coding architectures in participant models . On the other hand, most LSPs share many common components, suggesting the need to develop a publicly available common land model with a modular structure that could facilitate the exploration of new issues, less repetition of past efforts, and sharing of improvements and refinements contributed by different groups.The Common Land Model (CLM) effort dates back to the mid-1990s and has evolved through various workshops and e-mail correspondence. The initial motivation was to provide a framework for a truly community-developed land component of the National Center for Atmospheric Research (NCAR) Community Climate System Model (CCSM). Interest in applying CLM came from the Goddard Space Flight Center (GSFC) Data Assimilation Office (DAO), which was implementing the Mosaic model (Koster and Suarez 1992), and the Center for Ocean-Land-Atmosphere Studies (COLA) scientists, who were revising their Simplified Simple Biosphere Model (SSiB) (Xue et al. 1991). We also established ties to groups performing carbon cycle and ecological modeling.In developing CLM, we attempted to combine the best features of three existing successful and relatively

Atmospheric general circulation models used for climate simulation and weather forecasting require the fluxes of radiation, heat, water vapor, and momentum across the land-atmosphere interface to be specified. These fluxes are calculated by submodels called land surface parameterizations. Over the last 20 years, these parameterizations have evolved from simple, unrealistic schemes into credible representations of the global soil-vegetation-atmosphere transfer system as advances in plant physiological and hydrological research, advances in satellite data interpretation, and the results of largescale field experiments have been exploited. Some modern schemes incorporate biogeochemical and ecological knowledge and, when coupled with advanced climate and ocean models, will be capable of modeling the biological and physical responses of the Earth system to global change, for example, increasing atmospheric carbon dioxide.Until the early 1980s, global atmospheric general circulation models (AGCMs) incorporated very simple land surface parameterizations (LSPs) to estimate the exchanges of energy, heat, and momentum between the land surface and the atmosphere. These have since evolved into a family of schemes that can realistically describe a comprehensive range of land-atmosphere interactions. These advanced schemes will be needed to understand the response of the biosphere and the climate system to global change, for example, increasing atmospheric CO 2 (1-3).Three generations of models have taken us from the early LSPs to where we stand now. The first, developed in the late 1960s and 1970s, was based on simple aerodynamic bulk transfer formulas and often uniform prescriptions of surface parameters (albedo, aerodynamic roughness, and soil moisture availability) over the continents (4). In the early 1980s, a second generation of models explicitly recognized the effects of vegetation in the calculation of the surface energy balance (5, 6). At the same time, global, spatially varying data of land surface properties were assembled from ecological and geographical surveys published in the scientific literature (7). The latest (third generation) models use modern theories relating photosynthesis and plant water relations to provide a consistent description of energy exchange, evapotranspiration, and carbon exchange by plants (8-10). Some are beginning to incorporate treatments of nutrient dynamics and biogeography, so that vegetation systems can move in response to climate shifts. A series of largescale field experiments have been executed to validate the process models and scaling assumptions involved in land-atmosphere schemes (3). These experiments have also accelerated the development of methods for translating satellite data into global surface parameter sets for the models. Theoretical Background and the First-Generation ModelsIt has been understood for nearly 200 years that the continents and the atmosphere exchange energy, water, and carbon with each other. However, it was not until the late 1960s with the construct...

Knowledge of carbon exchange between the atmosphere, land and the oceans is important, given that the terrestrial and marine environments are currently absorbing about half of the carbon dioxide that is emitted by fossil-fuel combustion. This carbon uptake is therefore limiting the extent of atmospheric and climatic change, but its long-term nature remains uncertain. Here we provide an overview of the current state of knowledge of global and regional patterns of carbon exchange by terrestrial ecosystems. Atmospheric carbon dioxide and oxygen data confirm that the terrestrial biosphere was largely neutral with respect to net carbon exchange during the 1980s, but became a net carbon sink in the 1990s. This recent sink can be largely attributed to northern extratropical areas, and is roughly split between North America and Eurasia. Tropical land areas, however, were approximately in balance with respect to carbon exchange, implying a carbon sink that offset emissions due to tropical deforestation. The evolution of the terrestrial carbon sink is largely the result of changes in land use over time, such as regrowth on abandoned agricultural land and fire prevention, in addition to responses to environmental changes, such as longer growing seasons, and fertilization by carbon dioxide and nitrogen. Nevertheless, there remain considerable uncertainties as to the magnitude of the sink in different regions and the contribution of different processes.

Measurements of midday vertical atmospheric CO2 distributions reveal annual-mean vertical CO2 gradients that are inconsistent with atmospheric models that estimate a large transfer of terrestrial carbon from tropical to northern latitudes. The three models that most closely reproduce the observed annual-mean vertical CO2 gradients estimate weaker northern uptake of -1.5 petagrams of carbon per year (Pg C year(-1)) and weaker tropical emission of +0.1 Pg C year(-1) compared with previous consensus estimates of -2.4 and +1.8 Pg C year(-1), respectively. This suggests that northern terrestrial uptake of industrial CO2 emissions plays a smaller role than previously thought and that, after subtracting land-use emissions, tropical ecosystems may currently be strong sinks for CO2.