Background-Repair of the endothelium after vascular injury is crucial for preserving endothelial integrity and preventing the development of vascular disease. The underlying mechanisms of endothelial cell repair are largely unknown. We sought to investigate whether endothelial microparticles (EMPs), released from apoptotic endothelial cells (ECs), influence EC repair. Methods and Results-Systemic treatment of mice with EMPs after electric denudation of the endothelium accelerated reendothelialization in vivo. In vitro experiments revealed that EMP uptake in ECs promotes EC migration and proliferation, both critical steps in endothelial repair. To dissect the underlying mechanisms, Taqman microRNA array was performed, and microRNA (miR)-126 was identified as the predominantly expressed miR in EMPs. The following experiments demonstrated that miR-126 was transported into recipient human coronary artery endothelial cells by EMPs and functionally regulated the target protein sprouty-related, EVH1 domain-containing protein 1 (SPRED1). Knockdown of miR-126 in EMPs abrogated EMP-mediated effects on human coronary artery endothelial cell migration and proliferation in vitro and reendothelialization in vivo. Interestingly, after simulating diabetic conditions, EMPs derived from glucose-treated ECs contained significantly lower amounts of miR-126 and showed reduced endothelial repair capacity in vitro and in vivo. Finally, expression analysis of miR-126 in circulating microparticles from 176 patients with stable coronary artery disease with and without diabetes mellitus revealed a significantly reduced miR-126 expression in circulating microparticles from diabetic patients.
Conclusions-Endothelial
BackgroundCirculating microRNAs (miRNAs) are differentially regulated and selectively packaged in microvesicles (MVs). We evaluated whether circulating vascular and endothelial miRNAs in patients with stable coronary artery disease have prognostic value for the occurrence of cardiovascular (CV) events.Methods and ResultsTen miRNAs involved in the regulation of vascular performance—miR‐126, miR‐222, miR‐let7d, miR‐21, miR‐20a, miR‐27a, miR‐92a, miR‐17, miR‐130, and miR‐199a—were quantified in plasma and circulating MVs by reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction in 181 patients with stable coronary artery disease. The median duration of follow‐up for major adverse CV event–free survival was 6.1 years (range: 6.0–6.4 years). Events occurred in 55 patients (31.3%). There was no significant association between CV events and plasma level of the selected miRNAs. In contrast, increased expression of miR‐126 and miR‐199a in circulating MVs was significantly associated with a lower major adverse CV event rate. In univariate analysis, above‐median levels of miR‐126 in circulating MVs were predictors of major adverse CV event–free survival (hazard ratio: 0.485 [95% CI: 0.278 to 0.846]; P=0.007) and percutaneous coronary interventions (hazard ratio: 0.458 [95% CI: 0.222 to 0.945]; P=0.03). Likewise, an increased level of miR‐199a in circulating MVs was associated with a reduced risk of major adverse CV events (hazard ratio: 0.518 [95% CI: 0.299 to 0.898]; P=0.01) and revascularization (hazard ratio: 0.439 [95% CI: 0.232 to 0.832]; P=0.01) in univariate analysis. miRNA expression analysis in plasma compartments revealed that miR‐126 and miR‐199a are present mainly in circulating MVs. MV‐sorting experiments showed that endothelial cells and platelets were found to be the major cell sources of MVs containing miR‐126 and miR‐199a, respectively.ConclusionMVs containing miR‐126 and miR‐199a but not freely circulating miRNA expression predict the occurrence of CV events in patients with stable coronary artery disease.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.