We investigated the influence of the composition of the fibrolytic microbial community on the development and activities of hydrogen-utilizing microorganisms in the rumens of gnotobiotically reared lambs. Two groups of lambs were reared. The first group was inoculated with Fibrobacter succinogenes, a non-H 2 -producing species, as the main cellulolytic organism, and the second group was inoculated with Ruminococcus albus, Ruminococcus flavefaciens, and anaerobic fungi that produce hydrogen. The development of hydrogenotrophic bacterial communities, i.e., acetogens, fumarate and sulfate reducers, was monitored in the absence of methanogens and after inoculation of methanogens. Hydrogen production and utilization and methane production were measured in rumen content samples incubated in vitro in the presence of exogenous hydrogen (supplemented with fumarate or not supplemented with fumarate) or in the presence of ground alfalfa hay as a degradable substrate. Our results show that methane production was clearly reduced when the dominant fibrolytic species was a non-H 2 -producing species, such as Fibrobacter succinogenes, without significantly impairing fiber degradation and fermentations in the rumen. The addition of fumarate to the rumen contents stimulated H 2 utilization only by the ruminal microbiota inoculated with F. succinogenes, suggesting that these communities could play an important role in fumarate reduction in vivo.Hydrogen is a major intermediary metabolite in anaerobic degradation of organic matter. In ruminants, hydrogen is produced by hydrolytic and fermentative microorganisms and is mainly used by methanogenic Archaea to reduce carbon dioxide into methane. These microorganisms represent the main ruminal microbial community implicated in this pathway (33). Hydrogen transfer through methanogenesis is beneficial to the degradation of plant cell wall carbohydrates in the rumen (19,43,46). However, as a result of this process, methane is eructated by ruminants (400 to 500 liters per day per adult animal) and represents a loss of carbon and energy, accounting for 8 to 12% of the gross energy content of the diet (27, 37, 44). The amount of methane produced varies according to the diet (forage or concentrate) and the production system (intensive or extensive) (27,40). The contribution of livestock agriculture to greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions has been estimated to range between 9% and 18% of anthropogenic emissions, with methane representing between 30% and 50% of the total GHG emitted from the livestock sector (34). In that context, various strategies have been suggested in order to mitigate ruminant methane production (27,28,34). Reducing hydrogen production should be achieved without impairing efficacy of feed digestion and fermentation. Inhibition of activity and/or number of methanogens should be done in association with a stimulation of hydrogen-consuming pathways in order to avoid the negative effect of an increased partial pressure of this gas (28).The aim of the present work was to investigate t...