No abstract

The aim of the present study was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of eltrombopag, an oral thrombopoietin receptor agonist, in patients with chronic immune thrombocytopenia (ITP). Materials and Methods: A total of 285 chronic ITP patients (187 women, 65.6%; 98 men, 34.4%) followed in 55 centers were enrolled in this retrospective cohort. Response to treatment was assessed according to platelet count (/mm 3) and defined as complete (platelet count of >100,000/mm 3), partial (30,000-100,000/mm 3 or doubling of platelet count after treatment), or unresponsive (<30,000/mm 3). Clinical findings, descriptive features, response to treatment, and side effects were recorded. Correlations between descriptive, clinical, and hematological parameters were analyzed. Results: The median age at diagnosis was 43.9±20.6 (range: 3-95) years and the duration of follow-up was 18.0±6.4 (range: 6-28.2) months. Overall response rate was 86.7% (n=247). Complete and partial responses were observed in 182 (63.8%) and 65 (22.8%) patients, respectively. Thirty-eight patients (13.4%) did not respond to eltrombopag treatment. For patients above 60 years old (n=68), overall response rate was 89.7% (n=61), and for those above 80 Amaç: Bu çalışmanın amacı kronik immün trombositopeni (ITP) hastalarında bir oral trombopoietin reseptör agonisti olan eltrombopagın etkinlik ve güvenirliliğini değerlendirmektir. Gereç ve Yöntemler: Elli beş merkezde izlem altındaki toplam 285 kronik ITP hastası (187 kadın, %65,6) bu geriye dönük küme çalışmasına alınmıştır. Tedaviye yanıt trombosit sayısına göre değerlendirilmiş ve tam yanıt (>100.000/mm 3), kısmi yanıt (30.000-100.000/mm 3 veya tedaviden sonra trombosit sayısının bir kat artmış olması) ve yanıtsızlık (<30.000/mm 3) olarak tanımlanmıştır. Hastaların klinik bulguları, tanımlayıcı özellikleri, tedaviye yanıt ve yan etki bilgileri toplanmış ve aralarındaki ilişki incelenmiştir. Bulgular: Tanı anında yaş ortalaması 43,9±20,6 (3-95) yıl olan hastalar ortalama 18,0±6,4 (6-28,2) ay izlenmiştir. Tam ve kısmi yanıtı içeren toplam yanıt %86,7 (n=247) bulundu. Sırasıyla 182 (%63,8) ve 65 (%22,8) hastada tam ve parsiyel tedavi yanıtları gözlenmiştir. Otuz sekiz hasta (%13,4) eltrombopag tedavisine yanıt vermemiştir. Altmış yaş üzerindeki hastalarda (n=68) toplam yanıt %89,7 (n=61) bulunurken, bu oran 80 yaş üzerindeki (n=12) hastalarda %83 (n=10) olmuştur. Tedavi öncesi trombosit sayısı göz önüne alındığında, eltrombopag,

Venous thromboembolism (VTE) is generally classified as provoked or unprovoked. This dichotomy is important for following patients, mortality rate, prognosis and whether more efficient therapy is needed. In VTE patients, during initial diagnosis, it is not known exactly whether red cell distribution width (RDW) have a predictable value for this differentiation and pathogenesis. In this study, 298 patients with VTE and 197 control subjects were included. Patients with VTE were defined as provoked or unprovoked with respect to physical examination findings and laboratory values. Changes in RDW were tested between VTE patients and control subjects, provoked and unprovoked VTE patients, and separately with control subjects. RDW was found to be high in provoked and unprovoked groups compared with control group (p \ 0.001, p = 0.003 respectively). RDW was significantly high in provoked VTE patients group compared with unprovoked patients (p \ 0.001) and a cut-off value was found to be 13.6 %. In ROC analysis, sensitivity was 90.19 % and specificity was 82 % (95 % CI 85. . RDW could be used as a simple, costeffective and a reliable test independent of age in differentiation of provoked and unprovoked VTE. In order to better understand its role, prospective large homogenized population studies in different regions are necessary.

No abstract

Objective: This study aimed to retrospectively evaluate the efficacy, safety, and survival outcome of single-agent ibrutinib therapy in chronic lymphocytic leukemia patients. Materials and Methods: A total of 136 patients (mean age ± standard deviation: 64.6±10.3 years, 66.9% males) who had received at least one dose of ibrutinib were included in this retrospective multicenter, noninterventional hospital-registry study conducted at 33 centers across Turkey. Data on patient demographics, baseline characteristics, laboratory findings, and leukemia-cell cytogenetics were retrieved. Treatment response, survival outcome including overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS), and safety data were analyzed. Results: Overall, 36.7% of patients were categorized as Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) class 2-3, while 44.9% were in Rai stage 4. Fluorescence in situ hybridization revealed the presence of del(17p) in 39.8% of the patients. Patients received a median of 2.0 (range: 0-7) lines of pre-ibrutinib therapy. Median duration of therapy was 8.8 months (range: 0.4-58.0 months). The 1-year PFS and OS rates were 82.2% and 84.6%, respectively, while median PFS time was 30.0 (standard error, 95% confidence interval: 5.1, 20.0-40.0) months and median OS time was 37.9 (3.2, 31.5-44.2) months. Treatment response (complete or partial response), PFS time, and OS time were better with 0-2 lines versus 3-7 lines of prior therapy (p<0.001, p=0.001, and p<0.001, respectively), with ECOG class 0-1 versus class 2-3 (p=0.006, p=0.011, and p=0.001, respectively), and with Rai stage 0-2 versus 3-4 (p=0.002, p=0.001, and p=0.002, respectively). No significant difference was noted in treatment response rates or survival outcome with respect to the presence of comorbidity, bulky disease, or del(17p). While 176 adverse events (AEs) were reported in 74 (54.4%) patients, 46 of those 176 AEs were grade 3-4, including pneumonia (n=12), neutropenia (n=11), anemia (n=5), thrombocytopenia (n=5), and fever (n=5). Conclusion: This real-life analysis confirms the favorable efficacy and safety profile of long-term ibrutinib treatment while emphasizing the potential adverse impacts of poorer ECOG performance status, heavy treatment prior to ibrutinib, and advanced Rai stage on patient compliance, treatment response, and survival outcomes.