The G-1 column is an extracorporeal type granulocytapheresis device packed with 220 g cellulose acetate beads to which granulocytes and monocytes specifically adhere. A total of 59 rheumatoid arthritis patients with elevated granulocyte counts from 4 hospitals in Japan received 2 apheresis sessions of 1 h duratiodweek for a total of 8 times over a period of 4 weeks. About 55% of the leukocytes which entered the G-1 column were adsorbed onto the beads; 95% were granulocytes, 3.5% monocytes, and 0.4% lymphocytes. Clinical and efficacy assessments showed improvements in swollen joints (p < O.Ol), tender joints (p < 0.001), the active joint score (p < 0.001), duration of morning stiffness (p < 0.01), and grip strength (p < 0.001). In good responders, the improvements were observed for up to 12 weeks following the last apheresis. Exacerbation was noted in 2 patients. It is suggested that the efficacy of the G-1 column is attributable to the removal or suppression of hyperactive leukocytes and inflammatory cytokines, inducing a kind of immunomodulation.

BackgroundThe available information on granulocyte and monocyte adsorptive apheresis (GMA) in patients with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) under special situations remains unclear. We conducted a retrospective, multicentre cohort study to evaluate the safety and effectiveness of GMA in patients with IBD under special situations.MethodsThis study included patients with ulcerative colitis (UC) or Crohn’s disease who had at least one special situation feature and who had received GMA between November 2013 and March 2017. The incidence of adverse events (AEs) was compared in relation to the special situation, and patient background factors related to an AE were identified. For patients with UC, clinical remission was defined as a partial Mayo score of ≤2.ResultsA total of 437 patients were included in this study. The incidence of AEs among the elderly patients (11.2%) was similar in all patients (11.4%), whereas the incidences of AEs in patients on multiple immunosuppressant medications (15.2%), patients with anaemia (18.1%) and paediatric/adolescent patients (18.9%) were higher than that in all patients (11.4%). In multivariate analysis, anaemia and concomitant immunosuppressant medications were independently associated with the incidence of AEs. Clinical remission was achieved in 46.4% of the patients with UC.ConclusionsThe incidence of AEs in the elderly patients was not higher than that in all patients, whereas the incidence of AE was higher in patients with anaemia and those on multiple immunosuppressant medications than that in all patients. GMA is a safe treatment option in elderly patients with IBD.

No abstract