ObjectivesCoronavirus disease (COVID-19) blindness, that is, the excessive consideration of the disease in diagnosis, has reportedly led to delayed diagnosis of some diseases. We compared several clinical measures between patients admitted for bacteremia during the two months of the COVID-19 pandemic and those admitted during the same period in 2019. We hypothesized that the pandemic has led to delayed treatment of bacteremia.MethodsThis retrospective observational study compared several measures undertaken for patients who visited the emergency unit in two hospitals between March 1 and May 31, 2020, during the COVID-19 pandemic and whose blood cultures tested positive for bacteremia with those for corresponding patients treated during the same period in 2019. The primary measure was time from consultation to blood culture/antimicrobials.ResultsWe included 29 eligible patients from 2020 and 26 from 2019. In 2020, the time from consultation to antimicrobial administration was significantly longer than in 2019 (mean [range], 222 [145–309] min vs. 139 [102–179] min, p=0.002). The frequency of chest computed tomography (CT) was significantly higher in 2020 (96.6 vs. 73.1%, p=0.021). Significant differences were not observed in the time to blood culture or chest CT preceding the blood culture between the two periods.ConclusionsOur findings suggested that due to the COVID-19 epidemic/pandemic, focusing on the exclusion of its infection using CT scans leads to an overall delay in the diagnosis and treatment of bacteremia. Medical providers must be aware of COVID-19 blindness and evaluate patients objectively based on rational criteria and take appropriate action.

Lower gastrointestinal perforation is rare and challenging to diagnose in patients presenting with an acute abdomen. However, no study has examined the frequency and associated factors of diagnostic errors related to lower gastrointestinal perforation. This large-scale multicenter retrospective study investigated the frequency of diagnostic errors and identified the associated factors. Factors at the level of the patient, symptoms, situation, and physician were included in the analysis. Data were collected from nine institutions, between January 1, 2015 and December 31, 2019. Timely diagnosis was defined as diagnosis at the first visit in computed tomography (CT)-capable facilities or referral to an appropriate medical institution immediately following the first visit to a non-CT-capable facility. Cases not meeting this definition were defined as diagnostic errors that resulted in delayed diagnosis. Of the 439 cases of lower gastrointestinal perforation identified, delayed diagnosis occurred in 138 cases (31.4%). Multivariate logistic regression analysis revealed a significant association between examination by a non-generalist and delayed diagnosis. Other factors showing a tendency with delayed diagnosis included presence of fever, absence of abdominal tenderness, and unavailability of urgent radiology reports. Initial misdiagnoses were mainly gastroenteritis, constipation, and small bowel obstruction. In conclusion, diagnostic errors occurred in about one-third of patients with a lower gastrointestinal perforation.

This is a case of subcutaneous panniculitis‐like T‐cell lymphoma (SPTCL) was diagnosed by skin biopsy in a patient who presented with fever and erythema nodosum in the umbilicum following mRNA‐1273 COVID‐19 vaccination. COVID‐19 vaccines may cause SPTCL and skin biopsy may help in the diagnosis of erythema nodosum.

A 40-year-old man presented at our hospital with anaemia that had been undiagnosed for 2 years. Blood tests, endoscopy, and contrast-enhanced computed tomography were performed, but a definitive diagnosis could not be made. A subsequent bone marrow biopsy revealed basophilic stippling in transformed red blood cells, which led to a differential diagnosis of lead poisoning. Additional tests revealed elevated levels of lead in the blood. Basophilic stippling is generally found on a peripheral blood smear in lead poisoning patients; however, in this case, basophilic stippling was found only on the bone marrow smear and not in the blood smear. Even if basophilic stippling is not found in the peripheral blood, lead poisoning cannot be excluded.

No abstract