Background This meta-analysis aimed to determine whether artificial intelligence (AI) improves colonoscopy outcome metrics i.e. adenoma detection rate (ADR) and polyp detection rate (PDR). Methods Two authors independently searched Web of Science, PubMed, Science Direct, and Cochrane Library to find all published research before July 2021 that has compared AI-aided colonoscopy with routine colonoscopy (RC) for detection of adenoma and polyp. Results This meta-analysis included 10 RCTs with 6629 individuals in AI-aided (n = 3300) and routine (n = 3329) groups. The results showed that both ADR (RR, 1.43; P < 0.001) and PDR (RR, 1.44; P < 0.001) using AI-aided endoscopy were significantly greater when compared with RC. The adenomas detected per colonoscopy (APC) (WMD, 0.25; P = 0.009), polyps detected per colonoscopy (PPC) (WMD, 0.52; P < 0.001), and sessile serrated lesions detected per colonoscopy (SSLPC) (RR, 1.53; P < 0.001) were significantly higher in the AI-aided group compared with the RC group. Subgroup analysis based on size, location, and shape of adenomas and polyps demonstrated that, except for in the cecum and pedunculated adenomas or polyps, the AI-aided groups of the other subgroups are more advantageous. Withdrawal time was longer in the AI-aided group when biopsies were included, while withdrawal time excluding biopsy time showed no significant difference. Conclusions AI-aided polyp detection system significantly increases lesion detection rate. In addition, lesion detection by AI is hardly affected by factors such as size, location, and shape.

BackgroundThe efficacy of enteral immunonutrition (EIN) in patients undergoing gastrointestinal cancer surgery remains debatable. This meta-analysis aimed to investigate the effectiveness of EIN administration in patients undergoing surgery for gastrointestinal cancer.MethodsFrom January 2000 to January 2022, PubMed, EMBASE, Cochrane Library, and Web of Science were thoroughly searched for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) with EIN versus standard diet or no supplement in patients undergoing surgery for gastrointestinal cancer. Overall complications and infectious complications were the primary outcomes. The secondary results were non-infectious complications, mortality, length of hospital stay, and enteral nutrition-related complications.ResultsThirty-five studies reporting 3,692 patients undergoing surgery for gastrointestinal cancer (including gastric cancer, colorectal cancer, esophageal cancer, periampullary cancer, or pancreatic cancer) were included. Compared with the control group, EIN group had a significantly decreased incidence of overall complications (RR = 0.79, p &lt; 0.001). Infectious complications in patients who received EIN were considerably lower than in the control group (RR = 0.66, p &lt; 0.001). Compared to the control group, the incidence of surgical site infection, abdominal abscess, anastomotic leakage, bacteremia, duration of systemic inflammatory response syndrome (SIRS), and duration of antibiotic therapy was significantly lower in the specific infectious complications treated with EIN. Still, there was no significant difference between the two groups with other infectious complications. Moreover, a substantial shortening in the length of hospital stay was shown in EIN group compared with the control group. Still, no significant effect of EIN was demonstrated in non-infectious complicatios and mortality. The enteral nutrition-related complications had no significant difference between two groups.ConclusionsEIN is safe and effective in reducing overall complications, infectious complications, and hospital stay in patients undergoing gastrointestinal cancer surgery (including gastric cancer, colorectal cancer, esophageal cancer, periampullary cancer, or pancreatic cancer).

Background: This study aimed to investigate the clinical efficacy of programmed death-1 receptor and ligand-1 (PD-1/PD-L1) inhibitors in gastroesophageal cancer patients and the relationship between their clinicopathological features and curative treatment effects.Methods: A systematic search was conducted for articles published before April 2022 from online databases (PubMed, EMBASE, Web of Science and the Cochrane Library). The main outcome was overall survival (OS).Results: This meta-analysis comprised 16 studies involving 9,304 participants. The results indicated that compared with chemotherapy, patients treated with PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors had significantly improved OS (HR = 0.80; p &lt; 0.001) but no significant improvement in progression-free survival (PFS) (p = 0.185). Subgroup analyses demonstrated that PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors combined with chemotherapy, esophageal squamous cell carcinoma, male, Asian patients and combined positive score (CPS) ≥1 were significantly associated with better survival outcomes. Further, subgroup analysis of gender revealed that the OS of all subgroups containing male patients was significantly improved compared with chemotherapy, unlike that of female patients. In addition, the line of therapy, Lauren classification, age and eastern cooperative oncology group (ECOG) performance status were not associated with PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors efficacy.Conclusion: The results indicated that PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors could prolong the OS of advanced gastroesophageal cancer patients. Clinicopathological features such as therapeutic schedules, tumor types, histological type, gender, geographical region and PD-L1 expression status (CPS) seemed to be associated with survival outcomes.

No abstract

Objective Bariatric surgery increases the risk of postoperative gallstone formation. Many studies have proposed ursodeoxycholic acid (UDCA) as a preventive agent for postoperative gallstone formation. This study aimed to investigate the effect of UDCA on gallstone formation after bariatric surgery in patients without preoperative gallstones. Methods PubMed, the Web of Science, the Cochrane Library, and EBSCO were searched for articles assessing the effect of UDCA on gallstone formation after bariatric surgery. The outcome was the incidence of postoperative gallstones. Odds ratios were used to assess dichotomous variables, and random‐effects models were used for statistical analyses. Results A total of 18 studies including 4,827 participants met the inclusion criteria. The statistical results showed that the incidence of gallstones in the UDCA group was significantly lower than in the control group. Furthermore, the occurrence of symptomatic gallstones and cholecystectomy was significantly reduced. Conclusions In patients without preoperative gallstones, UDCA can effectively prevent the formation of gallstones after bariatric surgery. In addition, UDCA can significantly reduce the occurrence of symptomatic gallstones and the risk of postoperative cholecystectomy. Doses of 500 to 600 mg/d can be used as a measure to prevent postoperative gallstone formation.