The FACT-B scored the highest on overall on our EMPRO evaluation of instruments measuring health-related quality of life among breast cancer patients. However, depending on the purpose of the study, several instruments (EORTC BR-23, IBCSG, SF-36, and WHO-QOL BREF) have shown good performance in some of the specific individual dimensions included in the EMPRO.

Accurate HCV prevalence estimates are necessary for guiding elimination policies. Our aim was to determine the HCV prevalence and assess the cost‐effectiveness of a screen‐and‐treat strategy in the Spanish population. A population‐based, cross‐sectional study (PREVHEP‐ETHON Cohort, Epidemiological sTudy of Hepatic infectiONs; NCT02749864) was performed from July 2015‐April 2017. Participants from three Spanish regions were selected using two‐stage conglomerate sampling, and stratified by age, with randomized subject selection. Anthropometric and demographic data were collected, and blood samples were taken to detect anti‐HCV antibodies/quantify HCV RNA. The cost‐effectiveness of the screening strategies and treatment were analysed using a Markov model. Among 12 246 participants aged 20‐74 (58.4% females), the overall anti‐HCV prevalence was 1.2% (95% CI 1.0‐1.4), whereas the detectable HCV‐RNA prevalence was 0.3% (0.2‐0.4). Infection rates were highest in subjects aged 50‐74 years [anti‐HCV 1.6% (1.3‐1.9), HCV RNA 0.4% (0.3‐0.6]. Among the 147 anti‐HCV + subjects, 38 (25.9%) had active infections while 109 (74.1%) had been cleared of infection; 44 (40.4%) had cleared after antiviral treatment, whereas 65 (59.6%) had cleared spontaneously. Overall, 59.8% of the anti‐HCV + participants were aware of their serological status. Considering a cost of treatment of €7000/patient, implementing screening programmes is cost‐effective across all age cohorts, particularly in patients aged 50‐54 (negative incremental cost‐effectiveness ratio which indicates a cost‐saving strategy). The current HCV burden is lower than previously estimated, with approximately 25% of anti‐HCV + individuals having an active infection. A strategy of screening and treatment at current treatment prices in Spain is cost‐effective across all age cohorts.

Aims: The study aimed to assess the budgetary impact (BI) of reimbursing varenicline in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), type-2 diabetes mellitus (t2-DM) or cardiovascular diseases (CVD). Methods: The BI was estimated comparing the current non-reimbursed scenario versus a projected reimbursed scenario using the Spanish National Health System (SNHS) perspective. A hybrid model was developed using epidemiological data and Markov chains to estimate smoking cessation rates with varenicline during a 5-year horizon. Costs of cessation were considered in the reimbursement scenario only. Efficacy, expressed as a 1-year continuous abstinence rate, was derived from clinical trials. Cost savings due to smoking cessation were extracted from local cost-of-illness studies. Results are shown as incremental cost savings. Univariate sensitivity analysis was also applied. Results: A total of 68,684 patients stopped smoking in the reimbursed scenario compared with 15,208 without reimbursement. In the reimbursed scenario, total savings accounted for €36.3 million, showing 14.6 million accumulated additional savings compared with the scenario without reimbursement. Sensitivity analyses showed results to be robust with monetary savings starting in the third year of modeling. Conclusion: Reimbursement of varenicline in smoking cessation is a cost-effective health policy in the SNHS in COPD, t2-DM or CVD, and could produce cost savings starting in the third year of implementation.

Funding smoking cessation drugs in patients with MDD is of economic benefit to Spain and could produce net savings from the third year of implementation.

A523smokers of one or more years since quitting smoking and never smokers. HRU and sick leaves accounting for productivity loss were computed on an annualized basis. Multivariate general linear models adjusting for sex, age and number of comorbidities were applied. Results: A total of 1,816 [mean age 62.4+15.4 years (76.9% female)] records were analyzed: 381 smokers, 290 former smokers, and 1,145 from never smokers. Smokers had higher both total and healthcare annual costs (€ 2941 and € 2,283, respectively) than former smokers (€ 2,143 and € 1,740) and never smokers (€ 2,397 and € 1,866), p= 0.061 and p= 0.036: exceed cost of € 798 and € 543 (p= 0.037 and p= 0.029) and € 543 and € 417 (p= 0.105 and p= 0.042), respectively. Medical visits to healthcare professionals accounted for 54% of total annual costs while indirect costs depicted 22%. ConClusions: Subjects with a DD who still smoke are associated with higher HRU and costs from the societal perspective, when compared with both former and never smokers in the Spanish general population. As a consequence, quitting smoking in patients with a DD might be a value-for-money health policy in Spain.