There have been numerous studies about the health implication of COVID-19 on patients, but little attention has been paid to the impacts of the pandemic on physicians. Our paper attends to this gap by exploring the mental health of physicians in Bangladesh during the COVID-19 pandemic. This is particularly important since the mental health of physicians impacts not only on themselves, but also their professional performance and hence the care of patients. This study examined physicians' mental health outcomes by evaluating the prevalence and associated potential risk factors of anxiety and depression. Using a web-based cross-sectional survey, we collected data from 114 physicians. Seven-item Generalized Anxiety Disorder (GAD-7) scale and Nine-item Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ-9) were used to measure the anxiety and depression, respectively. Multivariate logistic regression models were used to explore the potential risk factors related to anxiety and depression. The prevalence of anxiety and depression were 32.5 and 34.2%, respectively. Findings revealed that marital status, work per day and current job location were the main risk factors for anxiety while sex, age, and marital status were the main risk factors for depression. Our results highlight the need to implement policies and strategies for positively impacting the mental health of physicians during and after the COVID-19 pandemic.

No abstract

Background: Management of airway is central to the Practice of anaesthesia. One of the anaesthesiologist fundamental roles is to maintain a patent airway at a all times.Maintaining a patent airway is essential for adequate oxygenation and ventilation and failure to do so, even for a brief period of time, can be life threatening. Recently, thyromental height test (TMHT) has been proposed as one of the highly sensitive and specific bedside tests to predict difficult airway.Objective: To assess the predictivity of thyromental height test in comparison to modified Mallampati test.Methods: This cross sectional study was carried out in Anesthesiology department of ISMCH during the period of January, 2015 to December, 2016. A total number of 139 consecutive patients scheduled for elective surgical procedure under general anaesthesia requiring intubation having American Society of Anesthesiologists grading I-II. Statistical analyses of the results were obtained by SPSS-20. Sensitivity, specificity, accuracy, positive predictive value and negative predictive value of Thyromental height test and Modified mallampati scoring in diagnosis of difficult airway were calculated.Results: Most (74.4) of the patients belonged to age ≤50 years. Male to female ratio was 1.01:1. Majority 91(65.5%) patients had thyromental height of ≥50 mm. In the diagnosis of difficult airway, Thyromental height test was 92.7% sensitivity, 93.5% specificity, 93.5% accuracy and 85.4% positive predictive values, 97.8% negative predictive value, 13.1% positive likelihood ratio, 0.05 negative likelihood ratio. On the other hand Modified mallampati scoring was 48.8% sensitivity, 92.7% specificity, 79.1% accuracy, 75.0% positive predictive values, 80.2% negative predictive value, 6.7% positive likelihood ratio, 0.55 negative likelihood ratio for prediction of difficult airway.Conclusions: It can be concluded that the thyromental height is useful diagnostic modality for predicting difficult airway.Bangladesh Journal of Medical Science Vol.17(3) 2018 p.455-461

No abstract

No abstract