To investigate the relationship between neutrophil/lymphocyte ratio, C-reactive protein/albumin ratio, plasma D-dimer and prognosis in patients with pulmonary thromboembolism, and to evaluate the risk of death. Methods: We retrospectively analyzed peripheral hematology and coagulation-related indicators of 362 pulmonary thromboembolism patients and 32 normal people, and the differences between the patients and control group and between good and poor prognosis groups were compared. And we analyzed and compared separate detection and combined detection of neutrophil/lymphocyte ratio, C-reactive protein/albumin ratio and D-dimer on the efficiency of risk of death in patients. Results: ① Neutrophil/lymphocyte ratio of pulmonary thromboembolism patients was 8.96±1.94, significantly higher than that of control group 1.76±0.53 (t=2.4281, P<0.05). C-reactive protein/albumin ratio was 2.13±2.08, significantly higher than 0.03±0.01 in control group (t=20.7736, P<0.01). D-dimer was 9.69±8.61mg/L, significantly higher than 0.20±0.11mg/L in control group (t=3.0066, P<0.01). ② Hemoglobin, lymphocyte, albumin and lymphocyte/monocyte ratio in patients with good prognosis were significantly lower than those in poor prognosis group, while white blood cell, C-creative protein, neutrophil, C-reactive protein/albumin ratio, neutrophil/lymphocyte ratio and D-dimer were significantly lower than those in poor prognosis group (P all <0.05). ③ Regression analysis showed that neutrophil/lymphocyte ratio (P=0.007), C-reactive protein/albumin ratio (P=0.010) and D-dimer (P=0.003) were independent prognostic factors for pulmonary thromboembolism. ④ In assessing the risk of death of patients, D-dimer alone had the highest sensitivity (93.1%), and C-reactive protein/albumin ratio alone had the highest specificity (68.8%). The combined detection of these three indicators had higher sensitivity (86.2%) and higher specificity (67.6%) at the same time. ⑤ The area under receiver operating characteristic curve for combined detection of neutrophil/lymphocyte ratio, C-reactive protein/albumin ratio and D-dimer was the largest (up to 0.821). Conclusion:Patients with pulmonary thromboembolism highly expressed in neutrophil/ lymphocyte ratio, C-reactive protein/albumin ratio and D-dimer. The combined detection of these three indicators can improve the assessment efficacy of the risk of death in patients with pulmonary thromboembolism.
Objective: To evaluate the clinical diagnostic value of C-reactive protein/albumin ratio (CAR), neutrophil/lymphocyte ratio (NLR) and D-dimer (D-D) in patients with pulmonary thromboembolism (PTE). Methods: We conducted a retrospective analysis comparing hematology and coagulation in 362 PTCA-confirmed PTE patients with the control group and analyzing their relationships with CAR, NLR, and D-D. Receiver operating characteristic curve (ROC) was used to analyze the diagnostic threshold, area under the curve (AUC), diagnostic sensitivity and specificity of CAR, NLR and D-D for PTE. Results: 1) CAR, NLR and D-D levels in PTE patients were 2.13 ± 2.08, 8.96 ± 1.94 and 9.69 ± 8.61 respectively, significantly higher than those in control group (CAR = 0.03 ± 0.01, t = 20.7736, P < 0.01; NLR = 1.76 ± 0.53, t = 2.4281, P < 0.05 and PTE = 0.20 ± 0.11, t = 3.0066, P < 0.01 respectively). 2) NLR was positively correlated with CAR (r = 0.2111, t = 4.0971, P < 0.01) and D-D (r = 0.1065, t = 2.0481, P < 0.05), but CAR was not correlated with D-D (r = 0.0975, P > 0.05). 3) The levels of HB, LY, PLT and AT in PTE patients were significantly lower than those in control group, while WBC, NE and FB were significantly higher than those in control group. 4) CAR was negatively correlated with Hb and AT (P all < 0.01), but positively correlated with WBC, NE, MO and FB (P all < 0.01). NLR was negatively correlated with LY and AT (P all < 0.01), but positively correlated with WBC, NE and FB (P all < 0.01). DD was negatively correlated with Hb and PLT (P all < 0.05), but positively correlated with WBC, NE and MO (P all < 0.01). Conclusion: The levels of Hb, LY, PLT and AT were significantly decreased in PTE patients, while WBC, NE and FB were significantly increased. CAR, NLR and D-D were highly expressed in PTE patients, and were closely correlated with Hb, AT *Co-first author.
Objective: Exploring the expression characteristics of CRP/ALB (CAR) in DLBCL patients and its value in prognostic judgment. Methods: We collected the basic information, clinical characteristics, laboratory examinations and follow-up prognosis of 142 newly diagnosed DLBCL patients with relatively complete data in our hospital and performed statistical analysis. We used Xtile analysis software to obtain the best cut-off value of CAR (0.33), compared the clinical characteristics and survival of patients in the high CAR group and the low CAR group, and compared the survival status with the IPI scoring system. Results: 1) There were significant differences in staging, grouping, IPI scores, extranodal involvement, LDH levels, β2-microglobulin, CA125, and Hb levels between the high CAR group and the low CAR group (all P < 0.05).2) According to the survival curve, the OS of the high CAR group was significantly shorter than that of the low CAR group (P < 0.01), and the one-year, three-year and five-year survival conditions of high CAR group were all shorter than those of low CAR group. 3) COX analysis showed that high CAR is an independent poor prognostic factor for DLBCL patients. 4) A comparative analysis of OS, three-year and five-year survival showed that the combination of CAR and IPI was significantly better than the IPI system, and there was no significant difference in the evaluation value of the prognosis between CAR alone and IPI alone. Conclusion: High CAR value, like the IPI scoring system, is an independent poor prognostic factor of DLBCL, can be used as a reliable indicator of prognosis. And CAR can also be combined with IPI to evaluate the prognosis of DLBCL, of which the effect is better than that of IPI alone.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
customersupport@researchsolutions.com
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.