Abstract. The net ecosystem
exchange (NEE) and methane (CH4) flux were measured by chamber
measurements for five distinct ecotypes (areas with unique eco-hydrological
characteristics) at Abbeyleix Bog in the Irish midlands over a 2-year
period. The ecotypes ranged from those with high-quality peat-forming
vegetation to communities indicative of degraded, drained conditions. Three
of these ecotypes were located in an area where peat was extracted by hand
and then abandoned and left to revegetate naturally at least 50 years prior
to the start of the study. Two of the ecotypes were located on an adjacent
raised bog, which although never mined for peat, was impacted by shallow
drainage and then restored (by drain blocking) 6 years prior to the start of
the study. Other major aspects of the carbon (C) balance, including dissolved
organic carbon (DOC), dissolved inorganic carbon (DIC), and open-water
CO2 evasion, were quantified for a catchment area at the study site
over the same 2-year period. The ecotype average annual ecotype C balance
ranged from a net C sink of -58±60 g C m−2 yr−1,
comparable to studies of intact peatlands, to a substantial C source of +205±80 g C m−2 yr−1, with NEE being the most variable component
of the C balance among the five ecotypes. Ecotype annual CH4 flux ranged from 2.7±1.4 g C-CH4 m−2 yr−1 to 14.2±4.8 g C-CH4 m−2 yr−1. Average annual aquatic C
losses were 14.4 g C m−2 yr−1
with DOC, DIC, and CO2 evasion of 10.4 g C m−2 yr−1,
1.3 g C m−2 yr−1, and 2.7 g C m−2 yr−1, respectively.
A statistically significant negative correlation
was found between the mean annual water table (MAWT) and the plot-scale NEE
but not the global warming potential (GWP). However, a significant negative
correlation was observed between the plot-scale percentage of Sphagnum moss cover and the
GWP, highlighting the importance of regenerating this keystone genus as a
climate change mitigation strategy in peatland restoration. The data from
this study were then compared to the rapidly growing number of peatland C
balance studies across boreal and temperate regions. The trend in NEE and
CH4 flux with respect to MAWT was compared for the five ecotypes in
this study and literature data from degraded/restored/recovering peatlands,
intact peatlands, and bare peat sites.
Field data of topography, water levels, and peat hydraulic conductivity collected over a 28‐year period have revealed the impacts of marginal drainage on uncut raised bog ecohydrology and its peat properties. Drainage of the regional groundwater body has induced changes in the hydraulic properties of deep peat, with peat compression decreasing hydraulic conductivity and storativity while simultaneously introducing localized secondary porosity and effective storage. Where peat has increased in hydraulic conductivity, there is a corresponding decline in vertical hydraulic gradients and significant localized increases in recharge to the underlying substrate. Repeated topographic surveys show intense localized areas of peat consolidation (>5%) where it is underlain by highly permeable (>10 m/day) glacial till deposits. More widely, continued subsidence (4–6 mm/year) of the bog surface has been measured over 900 m from the bog margin, resulting in the progressive loss of approximately 40% of actively growing raised bog since 1991. This loss has thus been shown to be attributable to changes in the underlying groundwater head due to deep‐cut drainage, rather than near‐surface peatland drainage. However, although reinstating regional hydrostatic pressures in order to restore this ombrotrophic peatland may control the rapid drainage through preferential flow pathways, this may not eliminate the ecological impacts resulting from changed surface morphology arising from subsidence. Hence, this longitudinal study provides new insights into the role that aquifer systems and groundwater bodies play in maintaining hydrogeological processes in ombrotrophic peatland systems, while highlighting the difficulty in ecological restoration where regional groundwater dependencies are significant.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.