Background: The thalamus is not only a key relay node of the thalamocortical circuit but also a hub in the regulation of gait. Previous studies of resting-state functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) have shown static functional connectivity (FC) between the thalamus and the cortex are disrupted in Parkinson's disease (PD) patients with freezing of gait (FOG). However, temporal dynamic FC between the thalamus and the cortex has not yet been characterized in these patients.Methods: Fifty PD patients, including 25 PD patients with FOG (PD-FOG) and 25 PD patients without FOG (PD-NFOG), and 25 healthy controls (HC) underwent resting-state fMRI. Seed-voxel-wise static and dynamic FC were calculated between each thalamic nuclei and other voxels across the brain using the 14 thalamic nuclei in both hemispheres as regions of interest. Associations between altered thalamic FC based on significant inter-group differences and severity of FOG symptoms were also examined in PD-FOG.Results: Both PD-FOG and PD-NFOG showed lower static FC between the right lateral posterior thalamic nuclei and right inferior parietal lobule (IPL) compared with HC. Altered FC dynamics between the thalamic nuclei and several cortical areas were identified in PD-FOG, as shown by temporal dynamic FC analyses. Specifically, relative to PD-NFOG or HC, PD-FOG showed greater fluctuations in FC between the left intralaminar (IL) nuclei and right IPL and between the left medial geniculate and left postcentral gyrus. Furthermore, the dynamics of FC between the left pulvinar anterior nuclei and left inferior frontal gyrus were upregulated in both PD-FOG and PD-NFOG. The dynamics of FC between the right ventral lateral nuclei and left paracentral lobule were elevated in PD-NFOG but were maintained in PD-FOG and HC. The quantitative variability of FC between the left IL nuclei and right IPL was positively correlated with the clinical scales scores in PD-FOG.Conclusions: Dynamic FC between the thalamic nuclei and relevant associative cortical areas involved in sensorimotor integration or cognitive function was disrupted in PD-FOG, which was reflected by greater temporal fluctuations. Abnormal dynamic FC between the left IL nuclei of the thalamus and right IPL was related to the severity of FOG.
BackgroundThe downregulation of monoamines, especially dopamine in substantia nigra (SN) and norepinephrine in locus coeruleus (LC), may be responsible for freezing of gait (FOG) pathological basis in Parkinson’s disease (PD).MethodsThirty-two Parkinson’s disease patients with freezing of gait (PD-FOG), 32 Parkinson’s disease patients without freezing of gait (PD-NFOG) and 32 healthy controls (HC) underwent neuromelanin magnetic resonance imaging (NM-MRI). The volume, surface area and contrast to noise ratio (CNR) of SN and LC were measured and compared. The correlation analyses were conducted between the measurements of SN and LC with clinical symptoms. We plotted the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve and determined the sensitivity and specificity of the CNR of SN and LC for discriminating the PD-FOG from the PD-NFOG.ResultsBoth PD-FOG and PD-NFOG showed decreased volume, surface area and CNR of SN compared with HC. The PD-FOG exhibited decreased volume and surface area of LC compared with both PD-NFOG and HC groups, and decreased CNR of LC compared with HC group. The volume, surface area and CNR of SN were negatively correlated with the Unified Parkinson’s Disease Rating Scale part III scores. The illness durations in PD patients were negatively correlated with the volume, surface area of SN, while not the CNR. And the volume and surface area of LC were negatively correlated with new freezing of gait questionnaire scores. ROC analyses indicated that the area under the curve (AUC) was 0.865 and 0.713 in the CNR of SN and LC, respectively, in PD versus HC, whereas it was 0.494 and 0.637 respectively, in PD-FOG versus PD-NFOG. Among these, for discriminating the PD from the HC, the sensitivity and specificity in the CNR of the SN was 90.6 and 71.9%, respectively, when the cut-off value was set at 2.101; the sensitivity and specificity in the CNR of the LC was 90.6 and 50.0%, respectively, when the cut-off value for CNR was set at 1.411.ConclusionThe dopaminergic changes in the SN were found across both PD-FOG and PD-NFOG, whilst LC noradrenergic neuron reduction was more evident in PD-FOG.
Objectives Patients with early Parkinson disease (PD) frequently defer initiation of levodopa treatment to minimize long-term complications. Nonergoline dopamine agonists, such as pramipexole and piribedil, are frequent first-line therapies for early PD patients, yet limited head-to-head randomized controlled trial (RCT) evidence exists for dopamine agonists in this population. We therefore conducted a systematic literature review and network meta-analysis. Methods MEDLINE, Embase, and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials were systematically searched (until January 7, 2020), identifying RCTs assessing the efficacy of piribedil or pramipexole in early PD. Eligible trial data were incorporated into fixed- and random-effects Bayesian network meta-analyses. Results No RCTs were identified directly comparing piribedil with pramipexole, but 6 trials provided data for pramipexole versus placebo and 2 compared piribedil versus placebo, facilitating indirect comparisons. Across all time points assessed, no significant differences were found between pramipexole and piribedil for change in the Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale (UPDRS) score from baseline. Piribedil and pramipexole demonstrated superiority relative to placebo for UPDRS II/III change at weeks 22 to 30. No significant differences were noted between the treatments at weeks 20 to 35 for anxiety, constipation, hypotension, nausea, and somnolence. Sensitivity analyses on adjustment for dose titration periods and baseline risk yielded the same pattern of results. Conclusions No significant differences were found for pramipexole versus piribedil in the UPDRS II/III scores from baseline in early PD, with similar safety profiles.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
customersupport@researchsolutions.com
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.