Background The Whipple procedure in its current form owes its evolution to the groundbreaking and innovative work of giants in the field of surgery. From being a multistep procedure with high morbidity and mortality, it is now ubiquitously performed in a single setting, often offered via minimally invasive approaches. Training to perform this procedure is an arduous task, and different training paradigms vary significantly. Objectives/Methods The purpose of this paper is to share a standard method by which the surgeon can perform the Whipple procedure in a systematic manner. Using illustrations to make the steps clearer, the authors will postulate that an improvement in mean operative time can be realistically achieved by most pancreatic surgeons. The focus is also on presenting this complex procedure as reproducible and teachable techniques for trainees. Conclusion This illustrated review of the Whipple procedure as performed at our institution is intended to help facilitate a streamlined and stepwise progression through what is undoubtedly a challenging surgical procedure. Although the procedure described will not apply to all Whipple operations given the heterogeneity in anatomy and circumstances, our hope is that this will lead to a more efficient procedure and decreased operating room time and costs as well as provide a framework to teach and measure technical progress for surgical trainees.

No abstract

Background Burnout has become a prominent topic, yet there are limited data on the manifestation of this phenomenon among surgical fellows. The goal of this study is to elucidate the prevalence of burnout and determine if there are protective or predisposing factors in surgical fellowship training. Methods A confidential electronic survey was distributed to Fellowship Council accredited fellows during the 2020–2021 academic year. Demographic information and training characteristics were queried. The fellows were then asked to complete the Maslach Burnout Inventory (MBI), Perceived Stress Scale (PSS), Short Grit Scale (SGS), Satisfaction with Life Scale (SLS), and General Self-Efficacy Scale (SE). Data were analyzed using p values of ≤ 0.05 as statistically significant. Results At the end of the survey period, 92 out of 196 (46.9%) fellowship trainees responded. 69.6% of respondents identified as men, 29.7% as international medical school graduates (IMGs), and 15.3% non-US IMGs. Based on criteria defined by the MBI, there was an 8.4% rate of burnout. Most respondents noted low stress levels (62.3%), good satisfaction with life (58.9%), a moderate amount of grit, and a high level of self-esteem. On comparative analysis, fellows with burnout had significantly higher stress levels, lower levels of satisfaction with life, and less self-esteem. Conclusions Overall, there was a low rate of burnout among fellows. We suggest this may be reflective of a self-selecting effect, as trainees who choose to undergo additional training may be less likely to experience this syndrome. In addition, there may be a protective factor during fellowship that results from inherent mentoring, increased specialization, and autonomy. Further investigation of the predisposing factors to burnout in fellowship trainees is warranted based on the results of this study.

No abstract

No abstract