Pain is most common symptom associated with progressive disorder, chronic kidney disease (CKD), and is usually undertreated during the early stages of CKD. So, present review was conducted to evaluate the challenges for the management of pain in CKD patients and addresses the scope for considering Diclofenac as suitable alternative for pain management in CKD patient. The database PubMed and Google Scholar were searched from 1970 to Dec 2020 for literature published in English and all studies, review articles that examined the use of Nonsteroidal Anti-Inflammatory Drugs (NSAIDs) in pain management in CKD patients were included. Literatures revealed that there is a considerable challenge in appropriate management of pain in CKD patients include understanding the altered pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of analgesics in CKD patients and the risk of acute interstitial nephritis. The shorter duration of analgesics is acceptable and considered to pose a low risk of acute interstitial nephritis in patients. Considering that Diclofenac has a shorter half-life and high efficacy, it may be well tolerated in patients with CKD. The acceptance of Diclofenac is partly attributed to being a potent COX-2 inhibitor with the lowest IC50 and its rapid onset of action at lowest effective dose. In conclusion, diclofenac may be well tolerated in patients of renal impairment when used at lowest effective dose for shortest dose duration. Diclofenac is worthy of consideration in mild to moderate cases of CKD. For effective pain management, it is vital to evaluate the tolerability and efficacy of the available analgesics critically.

A 52 year old previously healthy woman from Mumbai presented with fever and jaundice of 10 days duration. At admission, she was jaundiced with tachycardia, tachypnea, hypoxia, hypotension, conjunctival congestion and mild erythematous flush over the skin. She had very high WBC counts and CRP’s with direct hyperbilirubinemia and azotemia. Investigations for infectious causes of fever were negative. RT-PCR for SARS-CoV-2 in the nasopharynx was negative. However her SARS-CoV-2 antibodies were reactive. She also had echocardiographic and biochemical evidence of cardiac dysfunction. The diagnosis of Multisystem inflammatory syndrome–Adult (MIS-A) was thus established. She rapidly improved with intravenous immunoglobulin (2gm/kg) and high dose steroids.

A false-positive complement-dependent cytotoxicity cross-match (CDC XM) has a negative impact in donor selection process obliterating healthy, donor compatible population. A 47-year-old male with chronic kidney disease was planned for ABO-compatible renal transplantation from his sister. CDC and donor-specific antibody (DSA) lysate XM were negative 10 days before transplant. The pretransplant CDC XM showed 40% positivity. DSA lysate XM and HLA antibody screen were negative. Patient's Indirect antiglobulin test (IAT) was positive and anti-M antibody (IgG + IgM) was identified. Therapeutic plasma exchange, intravenous immunoglobulin, and rituximab were used for desensitization. Decrease in positivity of CDC XM and anti-M titer was seen. The transplant was performed successfully. Red cell alloantibody should be considered in differential diagnosis of a positive CDC XM. The utility of DSA lysate XM as a pretransplant monitoring tool is immense in such situations. Institutional policies regarding plan of action in the event of positive CDC XM and negative DSA lysate XM and vice versa should be formed.

Renal diseases like chronic kidney disease (CKD) and end-stage renal disease (ESRD) are a major healthcare burden in developing countries like India. Kidney transplantation is considered to be the most viable treatment option for such patients. In comparison to dialysis, renal transplantation is associated with reduced mortality and improved quality of life. However, a major challenge experienced in transplant procedures is transplant rejection. Four virtual advisory board meetings involving 30 nephrology experts were conducted to discuss the current therapeutic landscape of kidney transplant rejection in India and subsequent practice-based insights of the experts were garnered. The experts concurred on the need for appropriate screening including immunological profiling, diagnosis, and management of candidates for transplantation. While immunosuppressive therapy and strategies like plasmapheresis, intravenous immunoglobulin, corticosteroids, and rituximab have been well established in the treatment of transplant rejection, novel and emerging treatment modalities like interleukin-6 antagonists, imlifidase or complement inhibitors have shown promise and should be considered. Increased awareness among physicians about the development of newer immunosuppressive regimens with lower side effects that may improve long-term outcomes of kidney transplantation is warranted.