Purpose:Automated performance metrics provide a novel approach to the assessment of surgical performance. Herein, we present a construct validation of automated performance metrics during robotic assisted partial nephrectomy.Materials and Methods:Automated performance metrics (instrument motion tracking/system events) and synchronized surgical videos from da Vinci® Si systems during robotic assisted partial nephrectomy were recorded using a system data recorder. Each case was segmented into 7 steps: colon mobilization, ureteral identification/dissection, hilar dissection, exposure of tumor within Gerota’s fascia, intraoperative ultrasound/tumor scoring, tumor excision, and renorrhaphy. Automated performance metrics from each step were compared between expert (≥150 cases) and trainee (<150 cases) surgeons by Mann-Whitney U test (continuous variables) and Pearson’s chi-squared test (categorical variables). Clinical outcomes were collected prospectively and correlated to automated performance metrics and R.E.N.A.L. (radius, exophytic/endophytic, nearness of tumor to collecting system, anterior/posterior, location relative to polar line) nephrometry score by Spearman’s correlation coefficients (r).Results:A total of 50 robotic assisted partial nephrectomy cases were included for analysis, performed by 7 expert and 10 trainee surgeons. Automated performance metric profiles significantly differed between experts and novices in the initial 5 steps (p <0.05). Specifically, experts exhibited faster dominant instrument movement and greater dominant instrument usage (bimanual dexterity) than trainees in select steps (p ≤0.045). Automated performance metrics during tumor excision and renorrhaphy were significantly correlated with R.E.N.A.L. score (r ≥0.364; p ≤0.041). These included metrics related to instrument efficiency, task duration, and dominant instrument use.Conclusions:Experts are more efficient and directed in their movement during robotic assisted partial nephrectomy. Automated performance metrics during key steps correlate with objective measures of tumor complexity and may serve as predictors of clinical outcomes. These data help establish a standardized metric for surgeon assessment and training during robotic assisted partial nephrectomy.
Various researchers, for the past few decades, had tried to stabilize black cotton soil using lime for improving its shrinkage and swelling characteristics. But these days, the cost of lime has increased resulting in increase in need for alternative and cost effective waste materials such as fly ash and rice husk ash. Brick powder, one among the alternative materials, is a fine powdered waste that contains higher proportions of silica and is found near brick kilns in rural areas. e objective of the study is to investigate the use of lime-stabilized black cotton soil and brick powder mixture as subbase material in flexible pavements. Black cotton soil procured from the local area, tested for suitability as subbase material, turned out to be unsuitable as it resulted in very less CBR value. Even lime stabilization of black cotton soil under study has not showed up the required CBR value specified for the subbase material of flexible pavement by MORTH. Hence the lime-stabilized black cotton soil is proportioned with brick powder to obtain optimum mixture that yields a better CBR value. e mixture of 20% brick powder and 80% lime-stabilized black cotton soil under study resulted in increase in the CBR value by about 135% in comparison with lime-stabilized black cotton soil. us it is promising to use the mixture of brick powder and lime-stabilized black cotton soil as subbase material in flexible pavements.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.