Background: Although depression is recognized as the most common psychiatric disorder in hemodialysis patients with a significant negative impact on management and prognosis, we didn't find any previous data regarding its prevalence in Jordanian patients. Objectives: We conducted this study to determine the prevalence of depression in Jordanian hemodialysis patients, the factors that may influence it, and to boost the awareness of its detrimental consequences. Methods: In a descriptive cross-sectional study, patients on hemodialysis at the University of Jordan hospital in July 2015 participated in this survey utilizing a validated Arabic translation of the patient health questionnaire 9 (PHQ-9). The patients answered the questionnaire on the same day of dialysis, specifically, a few hours post dialysis when the effects of indistinguishable uremic symptoms are minimal. Results: From the 49 patients that completed the survey, we found 29% to have depression, though significantly higher than the general population, however, considerably lower than similar studies. This finding may be due to the critical timing of questionnaire answering that had been ignored in other studies and led to an overestimation of the diagnosis of depression in hemodialysis patients. Interestingly, most patients were unaware of the diagnosis and refused therapeutic intervention. Although the adequacy of hemodialysis correlated with depression, it didn't reach statistical significance. Also, several relevant factors didn't correlate with depression, which may imply an independent endogenous origin of the disorder in hemodialysis patients. Conclusions: Depression is highly prevalent and under diagnosed among hemodialysis patients in Jordan, which is ironic with patient's negative attitude towards the diagnosis and its treatment. Hence, we recommend a policy of routine assessment of depression accompanied by an educational program to emphasize the importance of treatment in improving the quality of life and the overall outcome of hemodialysis therapy.

Atrial fibrillation (AF) is the most prevalent cardiac arrhythmia in clinical practice and is a common comorbidity in hemodialysis patients. AF contributes to cardiovascular complications; therefore, it is recommended to screen for AF in high-risk patients to prevent serious complications. As we currently lack a handy AF screening tool, the aim of this study was to assess the accuracy of a modified BP monitor (Omron M6), in detecting AF in hemodialysis patients. In a cross-sectional analysis conducted from October 2018 to February 2019, we enrolled all the hemodialysis patients, older than 18 years and maintained on hemodialysis for at least 3 months in four hemodialysis centers in Jordan. Logistic regression was used to predict the accuracy, while the R package (epiR) was used to determine the sensitivity and specificity of the Omron M6 in screening AF. A total of 227 patients participated in the study, with a median age of 57 years (42.8-67.3); among these, 44.5% were female. Of all the participants, 18 were detected with AF, which was confirmed by a 12-lead ECG. The prevalence of AF in our study was 7.9%, while the sensitivity, specificity and accuracy of the Omron M6 in detecting AF were calculated as 83.0% (95% CI, 59.0-96.0), 94.0% (95% CI, 90.0-97.0) and 93.4% (95% CI, 88.0-95.0) respectively. We concluded that Omron M6 has high sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy in screening AF among hemodialysis patients. However, further studies are required to ascertain and firmly establish this preliminary finding.

Objectives An overlap between the somatic symptoms of depression and those of uremia seen in end-stage renal disease (ESRD) patients may affect the diagnosis of depression. This study aims to evaluate the effect of hemodialysis on the diagnosis of depression among patients on maintenance hemodialysis as dialysis diminishes the uremic symptoms, and to compare depression scores before and after dialysis. Methods This was a cross-sectional analytic study conducted from November 2018 through April 2019, in three tertiary hospitals. Consenting participants aged 18 years or older, who had received hemodialysis for at least three months were included. The Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ-9) tool was used to collect patients’ data and to identify symptoms of depression Pre- and post-hemodialysis. Depression scores were compared using the paired sample Wilcoxon rank test or the McNemar test, where appropriate. Results Overall, 163 participants were enrolled in the study. The average age of the participants was 56.5 years old, whereas 44.8% were females. The prevalence of depressive symptoms before hemodialysis was 48.5%, with prevalence of mild, moderate and moderately severe of 34.4%, 11.7% and 2.5%, respectively. On the other hand, the prevalence of depressive symptoms after hemodialysis was 46.6% with 36.8%, 9.2% and 0.6% of the participants reporting mild, moderate and moderately severe symptoms, respectively. We found no significant difference in depression scores before and after dialysis (p-values > 0.05). Conclusion Our study supports the fact that the prevalence of depression is high among patients with ESRD on maintenance hemodialysis. We didn’t find a significant difference in depression scores among hemodialysis patients before and after dialysis, with negligible effect of uremic symptoms on the diagnosis of depression. We suggest adopting routine screening of depression among this high-risk group of patients.

Background: Atrial fibrillation (AF) is the most prevalent sustained arrhythmia worldwide and it aggravates cardiovascular morbidity and mortality; however, this is largely under-diagnosed. Moreover, among end-stage renal disease patients on haemodialysis, AF is substantially more common and serious. The researchers conducted this study to assess the prevalence of, and the factors correlated with AF in Jordanian haemodialysis patients. Methods: In a cross-sectional analysis conducted from October 2018 to February 2019 in four tertiary hospitals, the researchers enrolled all consenting patients aged 18 years or older who were on haemodialysis for at least three months prior to the study. We screened for AF clinically by pulse palpation, precordial auscultation, by an automated blood pressure monitor and an electrocardiogram. The researchers reported qualitative variables as counts and frequencies, while continuous variables were summarised using the mean or median where necessary. We used multiple logistic regression with backward selection to identify independent risk factors of AF. Results: A total of 231 patients were enrolled; mean age was 54.8 ± 15.6 years (from 20 to 86), and 44.3% of them were women. The prevalence of AF was found to be 7.8% (95% CI, 4.8-12.2), with no gender disparity. Age (adjusted odds ratio [AOR] = 1.05; 95% CI, 1.01-1.10; p = 0.031), history of ischaemic heart disease (AOR = 3.74; 95% CI, 1.09-12.34; p = 0.033), history of smoking (AOR = 0.15; 95% CI, 0.02-0.60; p = 0.019), and low interdialytic weight gain (AOR = 0.50: 95% CI, 0.25-0.91; p = 0.031) were independently correlated to AF.