An experiment was designed to determine if, for equal SPL and power spectrum, the effects on hearing of high-kurtosis noise exposures and a Gaussian noise exposure are different and the extent to which any differences measured in terms of audiometric and histological variables are frequency specific. Three groups of chinchillas with 10 animals/group were exposed for 5 days at 90 dB SPL to one of three types of noise, each with the same power spectrum. The impulsiveness, defined by the kurtosis, and the region of the spectrum from which the impulsive components of the noise were created differed for two of the noises, while the third was a continuous Gaussian noise. The results show that the most impulsive noise produced up to 20 dB greater permanent threshold shift at the high frequencies than did the Gaussian noise exposure. However, these audiometric results were difficult to reconcile with the pattern of sensory cell losses that showed statistically significant larger losses of outer hair cells for the impulsive exposure in the 0.25-kHz region. When the impacts in a high-kurtosis noise were created from the energy in the 1- through 6-kHz region of the spectrum, the audiometric profile of hearing loss was similar to that produced by the Gaussian noise; however, inner hair cell losses were significantly greater in the 4-kHz octave band region of the cochlea.

A normative study of the cubic distortion product emissions from 104 monaural and binaural chinchillas was undertaken to establish criteria upon which noise exposed animals could be evaluated. From this normative group, 47 randomly selected chinchillas were exposed to various high level (150-, 155-, and 160-db peak SPL) impulse noises. Auditory evoked potentials and cubic distortion product otoacoustic emissions were measured on each animal pre- and post-exposure and related to the sensory cell populations 30 days post-exposure. Both group mean and individual animal data indicated that the distortion product emissions were more sensitive, frequency-specific indices of noise-induced cochlear effects than pure-tone threshold measures. This was particularly evident near the threshold for noise-induced damage to the outer hair cell system.

No abstract