Key Points Question What is the association of the use of checkpoint inhibitors with the risk of neurological adverse events? Findings In this meta-analysis of 39 trials evaluating the use of checkpoint inhibitors to treat various malignant neoplasms, the risk of neurological adverse events was lower when compared with chemotherapy. However, the risk of neurologic adverse events was higher with checkpoint inhibitors compared with placebo. Meaning These results suggest patients treated with checkpoint inhibitors are less likely to develop neurologic adverse events compared with other cancer medications, particularly cytotoxic chemotherapy.

We examined if urinary angiotensinogen (uAOG), a marker of intrarenal renin‐angiotensin system activity, antedates stage 3 chronic kidney disease (CKD) using samples from participants in the Diabetes Control and Complications Trial (DCCT) and later in the Epidemiology of Diabetes Intervention and Complications (EDIC) trial. In a nested case–control design, cases were matched at the outcome visit (eGFR less than 60, 21‐59 mL/min per 1.73 m2) on age, gender, and diabetes duration, with controls: eGFR (95, 75‐119, mL/min per 1.73 m2.) Additionally, in an exploratory analysis progressive renal decline (PRD), defined as eGFR loss >3.5 mL/min per 1.73m2/year, was evaluated using only data from EDIC because no progressions were observed during DCCT. At the EDIC visit, which antedated the GFR outcome visit by 2 years (range 1–7years) the median uAOG/creatinine was markedly higher in cases than in controls (13.9 vs. 3.8 ng/mg P = 0.003) whereas at the DCCT visit, which antedated the GFR outcome by 17 to 20 years it was not (2.75 vs. 3.16 ng/mg, respectively). The Odds Ratio for uAOG and CKD stage 3 development was significant after adjusting for eGFR, HbA1c, and systolic blood pressure 1.82 (1.00–3.29) but no longer significant when Albumin Excretion Ratio (AER) was included 1.21 (0.65–2.24).In the PRD analysis, uAOG/creatinine was sixfold higher in participants who experienced PRD than in those who did not (26 vs. 4.0 ng/mg, P = 0.003). The Odds Ratio for uAOG and PRD was significant after adjusting for eGFR, HbA1c, and systolic blood pressure 2.48 (1.46–4.22) but no longer significant when AER was included 1.32 (0.76–2.30). In people with type1 diabetes, a robust increase in uAOG antedates the development of stage 3 CKD but is not superior to AER in predicting this renal outcome. Increased uAOG moreover is associated with PRD, an index of progression to End Stage Kidney Disease (ESKD).

Inferior vena cava agenesis is a rare congenital vascular defect often diagnosed as an incidental finding in asymptomatic patients. When symptoms arise, it can present with chronic venous stasis or unprovoked deep vein thrombosis (DVT). A 42-year-old man with history of unprovoked right lower extremity (RLE) DVTs was admitted for swelling, pain and erythema to the RLE, concerning for new DVT. Venous Doppler ultrasound showed a chronic DVT of the right proximal femoral vein in addition to an acute DVT of the distal femoral vein. Extensive thrombophilia workup was negative and additional imaging with abdominal computed tomography scan revealed the absence of the infrarenal inferior vena cava. Patient was treated with oral anticoagulation and compression stockings and discharged with clinical improvement. At 3-month follow-up, patient was completely asymptomatic. Recurrent unprovoked DVTs in young patients require exhaustive work up including imaging studies to rule out vascular anomalies.

Background: An adequate bowel preparation prior to colonoscopy is a major quality-limiting factor that determines both the diagnostic and therapeutic yield of a colonoscopy. Colonoscopy is considered the gold standard for colon cancer screening and it is the primary approach to the workup of hematochezia, diarrhea and iron deficiency anemia (IDA). Several modifiable factors of bowel prep adequacy have been identified, that account for around 25% of inadequate bowel preparations in outpatient colonoscopies. However, the literature is sparse when examining the factors associated with inadequate preparations and procedure cancellations in an inpatient hospital setting. We aim to identify factors that affect bowel preparation adequacy and procedure cancellations among diagnostic colonoscopies performed during hospitalization. Methods:We retrospectively reviewed the electronic medical records of 1,500 consecutive patients who had a diagnostic colonoscopy as an inpatient at a tertiary level hospital over a 2-year period. All patients were administered a clear liquid diet the day prior to the colonoscopy. Patients were then instructed to drink 4 L of polyethylene glycol (PEG, Golytely) between 5 am to 9 am on the day of the procedure. The clinical course of each case was followed to identify quality of preparations, cancelled procedures and the reasons for cancellations. We applied univariate and multivariate logistic regression analysis to identify variables to predict cancellation and poor preparation. Results: A total of 1,029 patients were included in the study. 194 (18.8%) patients had colonoscopy cancellations and 268 (26.0%) had poor bowel preparations. Multivariate analysis revealed these factors to be associated with colonoscopy cancellations: education at the graduate school level [odds ratio (OR) =1.93, P=0.04], Hispanic ethnicity (OR=0.47, P<0.01), hemoglobin level <10 g/dL (OR=1.41, P=0.05) and if the colonoscopy was done for other indications (OR=0.53, P=0.04). Factors associated with poor bowel preparation on multivariate analysis, were dementia (OR=2.44, P=0.02), gastroparesis (OR=3.97, P=0.01) and inpatient opioids use (OR=1.69, P=0.04). Conclusions:The rate of colonoscopy cancellations and poor bowel preparations in inpatient colonoscopies were high, and we were able to identify predictors of inadequate colon preparation and procedure cancellations. Exploring more individualized colon preparation regimens based on personal risk factors could reduce the number of inadequate and cancelled colonoscopies in an inpatient setting.

No abstract