Purpose/Objectives: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the effect of the number of brain lesions for which stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) was performed on the dose volume relationships in normal brain. Materials and Methods: Brain tissue was segmented using the patient's pre-SRS MRI. For each plan, the following data points were recorded: total brain volume, number of lesions treated, volume of brain receiving 8 Gy (V8), V10, V12, and V15. Results: A total of 225 Gamma Knife® treatments were included in this retrospective analysis. The number of lesions treated ranged from 1 to 29. The isodose for prescription ranged from 40 to 95% (mean 55%). The mean prescription dose to tumor edge was 18 Gy. The mean coverage, selectivity, conformity, and gradient index were 97.5%, 0.63, 0.56, and 3.5, respectively. The mean V12 was 9.5 cm3 (ranging from 0.5 to 59.29). There was no correlation between the number of lesions and brain V8, V12, V10, or V15. There was a direct and statistically significant relationship between the brain volume treated (V8, V10, V12, and V15) and total volume of tumors treated (p < 0.001). In our study, the integral dose to the brain exceeded 3 J when the total tumor volume exceeded 25 cm3. Conclusions: The number of metastatic brain lesions treated bears no significant relationship to total brain tissue volume treated when using SRS. The fact that the integral dose to the brain exceeded 3 J when the total tumor volume exceeded 25 cm3 is useful for establishing guidelines. Although standard practice has favored using whole brain radiation therapy in patients with more than 4 lesions, a significant amount of normal brain tissue may be spared by treating these patients with SRS. SRS should be carefully considered in patients with multiple brain lesions, with the emphasis on total brain volume involved rather than the number of lesions to be treated.
Purpose The study was designed to evaluate the cumulative dose exposure of brain and hippocampus following multiple stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) procedures on a single patient. Materials and methods Ninety-four patients who received at least two SRS treatments were evaluated. Their SRS dose plans were summated to obtain dose volume parameters. Hippocampal structures were delineated, in addition to segmentation of the brain. Results A total of 267 treatments were delivered to 94 patients. The number of SRS procedures per patient varied from 2 to 7 (mean = 2.8), and the total number of lesions treated in a given patient over multiple treatments varied from 2 to 70 (mean = 11). The interval between the first and last SRS treatments varied from 1 to 79 months (mean = 16.2 months). The mean prescription dose was 16.7 Gy prescribed to isodose lines from 40 to 95%. The mean coverage, selectivity, Paddick conformity, and gradient index were 99.6%, 79%, 0.57, and 2.74, respectively. The mean summated dose delivered to the whole brain over the course of multiple treatments was 5.11 Gy. The hippocampal mean dose after summation was 2.95 Gy. Patients with plan PCIs averaging below the mean value of 0.57 had higher V8, V10, V12, and V15 values for a given total tumor volume when compared with more conformal plans (PCI > 0.57).Conclusions Repeat SRS delivered low cumulative doses to the brain and hippocampus with the lowest normal brain volumes irradiated in highly conformal plans.
Background Acute strokes involving complete, isolated occlusion of the extracranial cervical internal carotid artery (EC-ICA) with no intracranial clot burden account for a minority of stroke cases that are managed variably. Here we present our two-decade experience and a systematic review of endovascular management of acute isolated EC-ICA strokes in the hyperacute phase (<48 h) and attempt to evaluate clinical effectiveness and safety. Methods Our prospectively maintained database was retrospectively searched for patients who presented between January 1, 2003 and December 31, 2022 with acute cervical ICA stroke confirmed on angiography. Only patients who had an isolated 100% occlusion of the cervical ICA segment and attempted acute stenting with/without angioplasty within the first 48 h of time since last known well were included. Demographics, procedural details, and outcomes were recorded. For the systematic review, a search of PubMed and Embase databases was conducted. Results Forty-six patients with acute, isolated EC-ICA occlusive stroke were included. Median presenting National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS) score was 8 (interquartile range 3–10) with a perfusion deficit in 78.3% of the 40 cases assessed with computed tomography perfusion imaging. Median time from symptom onset to intra-arterial puncture was 14.4 h. Immediate recanalization was achieved in 82.6% cases. Two cases (4.3%) of symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage (sICH) occurred postprocedure. Outcome measures were stable or improved discharge NIHSS score in 86.9% of cases, functional independence at 90 days (modified Rankin scale score ≤2) in 78.3%, and mortality in 6.5%. The systematic review included 167 patients from four articles. The estimated rate of immediate recanalization was 92.7% (95% confidence interval (CI), 88.77–96.77%), favorable outcome was 62.01% (95% CI, 55.04–69.87%), and sICH was 6.2% (95% CI, 3.41–11.32%). Conclusion Stenting and angioplasty for acute cervical ICA occlusive strokes during the hyperacute phase can be performed successfully with favorable clinical outcomes and an acceptable recanalization rate.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
customersupport@researchsolutions.com
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
Copyright © 2025 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.