Objective:To evaluate whether flexibility and gender influence students' posture.Method:Evaluation of 60 female and male students, aged 5 to 14 years, divided into two
groups: normal flexibility (n=21) and reduced flexibility (n=39). Flexibility and
posture were assessed by photogrammetry and by the elevation of the lower limbs in
extension, considering the leg angle and the postural evaluation. Descriptive
statistics (mean and standard deviation) were used for data analysis. Analysis of
variance (ANOVA) was applied to assess the joint influence of flexibility and
gender on the posture-dependent variables. After verifying an interactive effect
between the variables of gender and flexibility, multiple comparisons using the t
test were applied.Results:Flexibility influenced the symmetry angle of the knee (p<0.05) and
anteroposterior body tilt (p<0.05). Gender did not influence postural angles
(p>0.05). There was an interactive effect between the variables of gender and
flexibility on the knee symmetry angle (p<0.02). Male students with reduced
flexibility had greater asymmetry of the knee when compared to the other
subgroups.Conclusion:Posture was influenced by an isolated effect of the variable of flexibility and by
an interactive effect between gender and flexibility.
Overall, there was a positive relationship between motor behavior, in particular activities involving interlimb coordination, and academic performance. Application of these findings in the area of early assessment may be useful in the identification of later academic problems.
Relation between prone, supine and sitting positioning time and motor development up to six months old Abstract: Introduction: The acquisition of motor skills depends on factors such as environment and experience.It follows that the motor development may be influenced by the positioning of infants during the first months of life. Objective: To verify the relation between prone, supine and sitting positioning time and motor development up to six months old. Method: Were evaluated 92 infants at term, of both genders, divided into three groups according to the corresponding bimester of chronological age (1 st bimester, n = 30; 2 nd bimester, n = 30; 3 rd bimester, n = 32).To verify the time spent in each position during the awake and sleeping periods, a timeline corresponding to 24 hours was developed. Each one-hour period could be filled with a positioning option. Motor development was
Objective:To describe a clinical report pre- and post-neurofunctional intervention in a case
of agenesis of the corpus callosum.Case description:Preterm infant with corpus callosum agenesis and hypoplasia of the cerebellum
vermis and lateral ventricles, who, at the age of two years, started the proposed
intervention. Functional performance tests were used such as the neurofunctional
evaluation, the Gross Motor Function Measure and the Gross Motor Function
Classification System. In the initial evaluation, absence of equilibrium
reactions, postural transfers, deficits in manual and trunk control were observed.
The intervention was conducted with a focus on function, prioritizing postural
control and guidance of the family to continue care in the home environment. After
the intervention, there was an improvement of body reactions, postural control and
movement acquisition of hands and limbs. The intervention also showed improvement
in functional performance.Comments:Postural control and transfers of positions were benefited by the neurofunction
intervention in this case of agenesis of the corpus callosum. The approach based
on function with activities that involve muscle strengthening and balance
reactions training, influenced the acquisition of a more selective motor
behavior.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.