Background:Chronic inflammatory arthritis(CIA) is considered the leading cause of disability that places severe limits on daily activity and quality of life for over 100 million Chinese. Nurse-led CIA management reveals tremendous benefits for CIA patients. European League Against Rheumatism(EULAR) developed the recommendations for the role of the nurse in the management of CIA in 2011, however, whether or not the recommendations could be fully implemented in China is unknown.Objectives:The aim was to test the EULAR recommendations among registered Chinese rheumatology nurses in terms of its agreement level, practicality, and adverse conditions to the implementation.Methods:We conducted an anonymous online questionnaire among registered clinical nurses in the department of rheumatology and immunology nationwide based on convenience sampling. The agreement and feasibility of the recommendations were assessed by visual analogue scale(VAS 0=total disagreement/completely infeasible, VAS 1–4=partial disagreement/partially infeasible, VAS 5–9=partial agreement/partially feasible, VAS 10=complete agreement/completely feasible). The respondents needed to select the reasons they agreed or disagreed and if they thought the recommendations were feasible or not.Results:485 subjects were included, and 438 valid questionnaires were retrieved(valid recovery rate=90.3%). The subjects were from 49 national medical centers with the average age of 31.65±6.65. The average years of working experience were 6.41±5.438. With each and every piece of the recommendation, approximately 50% of the subjects completely agreed(VAS 10), about 40% partially agreed(VAS 5–9), under 10%(VAS 1–4) partially disagreed and around 1%(VAS 0) totally disagreed(shown in figure 1A). As for the feasibility, around 30% of the subjects thought the recommendations were fully feasible(VAS 10), about 50% considered partially feasible (VAS 5–9), 10% partially infeasible(VAS 1–4), and less than 1% totally infeasible(shown in figure 1B). Factors made the subjects disapprove of the recommendations include busy clinical loading(39.98%), lack of professional knowledge and nursing skills(25.7%), patients did not accept the extended role of nurses(17.35%). In the meantime, lack of working time(16.33%), shortage of professional nurses(12.74%), lack of training and education(10.59%), lack of professional knowledge(9.22%), attitude of patients toward nurses(8.28%), and lack of financial support(7.53%) were the reasons that made subjects think the recommendations infeasible in China.Figure 1 the agreement and feasibility analysis of the EULAR recommendations in ChinaConclusions:The role and tasks of nurses should be clearly described in the framework in China. Professional training and educational nursing programs at both basic and advanced levels need to be well developed with the aim of providing better care and bringing added value to patients at a lower cost.Acknowledgements:The authors are grateful to 49 national medical centers that participated in this study.Disclosure ...
Chronic inflammatory arthritis (CIA) severely impacts quality of life in over 100 million people in China. In 2011, the European League Against Rheumatism (EULAR) developed recommendations for the role of nurses in the management of CIA. However, it remains unknown whether these recommendations could be fully implemented in China. Therefore, we aimed to solve the problem in this study. We conducted a nationwide cross-sectional study among 485 nurses in rheumatology and immunology departments based on an online questionnaire. The agreement of the recommendations by the subjects and the feasibility of the recommendations they believe were assessed by visual analogue scale (VAS). Our results showed that over 80% of the subjects agreed with each recommendation (VAS 5–10), and over 80% of the subjects considered the recommendations feasible (VAS 5–10). This study indicates that the EULAR recommendations can also be well implemented in China.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.