In India, GI tract cancer is one of the ten leading cancers. Among Indian males it stands second to oral cancer and in females, it shares the third place. Most common malignant disorder of GIT is seen in our country that of liver, bile, gall bladder, pancreas, bile-duct and colorectal. Aim: To see the significance of tumour markers in gall bladder cancer. Materials and Methods: This study comprise 225 cases of GI tract cancers was carried for more than two years. Of these, 22 subjects had gallbladder cancer. Tumour markers viz. CA19-9, CEA and AFP were assayed pre and post-operative cases and their role in gallbladder cancer was evaluated. Results: It was observed that serum concentration of CA 19-9 increased with advancing stage, but the same is not true for AFP and CEA. Sensitivity of these markers AFP, CA 19-9 and CEA in the detection of gall bladder cancer was determined. CA 19-9 is the most sensitive of all the three tumour markers in the detection of gall bladder cancer. Conclusion: The combination of CA19-9 and CT (or US) is a reasonable, cost-effective, noninvasive approach to establishing the diagnosis of pancreatic, cholangitic, or biliary cancer in nonicteric patients.
BACKGROUND Male breast cancer (BC) incidence is low and management is extrapolated from female BC. Breast conservation surgery (BCS) is commonly used for female BC, however, mastectomy remains the most frequently used surgical procedure for male breast cancer. We performed a literature review to assess the use of BCS in male BC as well as outcomes following BCS. METHODS A systematic literature review identified peer-reviewed articles in PubMed evaluating male BC and surgery. Abstracts were screened to identify studies that measured overall survival (OS), disease-free survival (DFS), or local recurrence (LR) in patients undergoing BCS. For all studies, we extracted the total number of patients and number of BCS cases. Of patients undergoing BCS, we further extracted mean age, mean follow-up time, clinical stage, type of axillary surgery [sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB), axillary lymph node dissection (ALND)], radiation therapy, hormonal therapy, and chemotherapy. Weighted averages, based on number of patients in each study, were performed for LR, DFS and 5-year OS. The time period for LR and DFS was the duration of follow-up time for each study. RESULTS The literature search yielded 4341 articles. Twelve studies published from 1998 to 2016 met the inclusion criteria and were selected for the systematic literature review. Among the 12,616 male breast surgery cases included, 1,633 (12.9%) underwent BCS. Only patients who underwent BCS were included in our analysis. The mean follow-up time was 54.4 months and mean age was 62.4 with stage II as the most common presentation. Two studies reported that 50-71.4% of patients underwent SLNB and 4 studies reported ALND in 14.3-100%. Seven studies reported that adjuvant radiation therapy was administered in 12.0-100% of 474 total patients undergoing BCS. Four studies reported use of hormonal therapy in 73.8-100% of patients. Four studies reported use of chemotherapy in 25-66.7% of patients. Seven studies reported LR among 122 patients, with a weighted average 11.8%. Four studies reported on 5-year OS in 1511 patients, with a weighted average of 85.8%. CONCLUSION While less commonly used than mastectomy, BCS can be considered a safe alternative in the surgical treatment of male BC. We have demonstrated that the use of adjuvant radiation following BCS is variable in this patient group. Future research should focus on better standardization of local therapy for male BC and improved reporting of outcomes. Citation Format: Fisher CS, de la Cruz L, Joshi S, Mah T-J, Blankenship S, Thiruchelvam P. Breast conservation surgery in male breast cancer: A systematic literature review [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2018 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2018 Dec 4-8; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2019;79(4 Suppl):Abstract nr P6-19-06.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
customersupport@researchsolutions.com
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.