SummaryThe Institute of Medicine has called for development of strategies to prevent medication errors, which are one important cause of preventable harm. Although the field of anesthesiology is considered a leader in patient safety, recent data suggest high medication error rates in anesthesia practice. Unfortunately, few error prevention strategies for anesthesia providers have been implemented. Using Toyota Production System quality improvement methodology, a multidisciplinary team observed 133 h of medication practice in the operating room at a tertiary care freestanding children's hospital. A failure mode and effects analysis was conducted to systematically deconstruct and evaluate each medication handling process step and score possible failure modes to quantify areas of risk. A bundle of five targeted countermeasures were identified and implemented over 12 months. Improvements in syringe labeling (73 to 96%), standardization of medication organization in the anesthesia workspace (0 to 100%), and two-provider infusion checks (23 to 59%) were observed. Medication error reporting improved during the project and was subsequently maintained. After intervention, the median medication error rate decreased from 1.56 to 0.95 per 1000 anesthetics. The frequency of medication error harm events reaching the patient also decreased. Systematic evaluation and standardization of medication handling processes by anesthesia providers in the operating room can decrease medication errors and improve patient safety.

Pain management following pediatric tonsillectomy and adenotonsillectomy surgery is challenging and traditionally involves perioperative opioids. However, the recent national opioid shortage compelled anesthesiologists at Bellevue Surgery Center to identify an alternative perioperative analgesic regimen that minimizes opioids yet provides effective pain relief. We assembled an interdisciplinary quality improvement team to trial a series of analgesic protocols using the Plan-Do-Study-Act cycle.Initially, we replaced intraoperative morphine and acetaminophen (M/A protocol) with intraoperative dexmedetomidine and preoperative ibuprofen (D/I protocol).However, when results were not favorable, we rapidly transitioned to intraoperative ketorolac and dexmedetomidine (D/K protocol). The following measures were evaluated using statistical process control chart methodology and interpreted using Shewhart's theory of variation: maximum pain score in the postanesthesia care unit, postoperative morphine rescue rate, postanesthesia care unit length of stay, total anesthesia time, postoperative nausea and vomiting rescue rate, and reoperation rate within 30 days of surgery. There were 333 patients in the M/A protocol, 211 patients in the D/I protocol, and 196 patients in the D/K protocol. With the D/I protocol, there were small increases in maximum pain score and postanesthesia care unit length of stay, but no difference in morphine rescue rate or total anesthesia time compared to the M/A protocol. With the D/K protocol, postoperative pain control and postanesthesia care unit length of stay were similar compared to the M/A protocol. Both the D/I and D/K protocols had reduced nausea and vomiting rescue rates. Reoperation rates were similar between groups. In summary, we identified an intraoperative anesthesia protocol for pediatric tonsillectomy and adenotonsillectomy surgery utilizing dexmedetomidine and ketorolac that provides effective analgesia without increasing recovery times or reoperation rates. K E Y W O R D S analgesics, anesthesia, dexmedetomidine, ketorolac, quality improvement, tonsillectomy | 683 FRANZ et Al.

No abstract