OBJECTIVERecent studies have demonstrated the efficacy of subfascial intrawound application of vancomycin powder in spine surgery in reducing the rate of surgical site infections (SSIs). However, to date no study has evaluated the efficacy and safety of suprafascial application of vancomycin powder in spine surgery. The purpose of this study was to quantify the rate of SSIs after open instrumented posterior spinal fusion with and without application of suprafascial vancomycin powder and to evaluate the rate of vancomycin powder–related local adverse effects.METHODSThe authors conducted a single-center retrospective case-control study of adult patients undergoing open instrumented posterior fusion of the cervical, thoracic, or lumbar spine performed by a single surgeon from January 2010 through December 2016. In March 2013, routine application of 1 g of suprafascial vancomycin powder was started for all cases in addition to standard systemic antibiotic prophylaxis. Baseline demographics and operative data as well as the SSI rates were compared between the study groups. The incidence of vancomycin powder–related adverse effects was analyzed.RESULTSA total of 515 patients (268 in the untreated group and 247 in the treated group) were included in the study. The mean age was significantly higher in the treated group than in the untreated group (58.4 vs 54.4 years, p < 0.01). Operative variables were similar between the study groups. Patients receiving vancomycin powder had a significantly lower infection rate (5.6% in the untreated group vs 0% in the treated group, p < 0.001). No vancomycin powder–related adverse effects were identified in the treated group.CONCLUSIONSRoutine application of suprafascial intrawound vancomycin powder in addition to systemic antibiotic prophylaxis is an easy-to-use, safe, and effective strategy for preventing SSIs after instrumented posterior spinal fusion. Suprafascial application of vancomycin powder could be a valuable alternative to previously reported subfascial distribution, minimizing the risk of local adverse drug reactions.

A single-center retrospective comparative study was designed to identify the risk factors for restenosis of lumbar foraminal stenosis (LFS) after microscopic foraminal decompression (MFD). 21 consecutive patients who underwent single-level MFD with an average of 19-month follow-up were divided into two study groups based on clinical outcomes; group 1 (7 patients with poor outcomes requiring revision surgery), group 2 (14 patients with good outcomes with no revision surgery required). Changes of lumbar spinal alignment on plain standing radiographs were compared and analyzed between two study groups to investigate the pathology and risk factors associated with restenosis after MFD. Preoperative disc wedging (DW) angle was significantly larger in group 1 than in group 2 (3.5 ± 1.0° vs 1.1 ± 0.2°, P < 0.01). Postoperatively, disc height (DH) and foraminal height (FH) decreased (P < 0.05), and DW deteriorated (P < 0.01) significantly in group 1, while there were no significant changes in group 2. Lumbar lordosis (LL) remarkably improved postoperatively in group 2 (24.7 ± 8.0 to 32.0 ± 7.0, P < 0.001), contrary to limited improvement in group 1 (25.1 ± 9.2 to 27.0 ± 12.0, P = 0.45). Postoperative LL is a predictive factor for restenosis after MFD. Decrease in DH or progression of DW was contributing to restenosis. LFS presenting with large DW and lumbar degenerative kyphosis should be excluded from surgical indications for MFD without instrumented fusion, considering the high recurrence rate.

The outcomes and complications of posterior-only lumbar instrumented long fusions exceeding three segments with selective segmental transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion for the treatment of degenerative lumbar scoliosis, kyphosis, or both combined with spondylolisthesis were analyzed to investigate risk factors associated with surgical instrumentation failure. Fifteen consecutive patients with degenerative lumbar scoliosis, kyphosis, or both combined with spondylolisthesis were studied retrospectively. There were 5 male and 10 female patients, with a mean age of 71.8 years. All the patients were followed for a mean duration of 19.4 months postoperatively. Radiographic evaluation included coronal Cobb angle, lumbar lordosis (LL) angle, pelvic incidence (PI), and pelvic tilt (PT). The clinical outcomes were assessed by means of Japanese Orthopedic Association (JOA) score. Patients were divided into two groups: group 1—7 patients with surgical complications; group 2—8 patients without complications. The preoperative and postoperative coronal Cobb's angle were not significantly different between groups 1 and 2. The LL highly correlated with developing surgical complications. There were statistically significant differences in preoperative and postoperative LL and the mean difference between PI and the LL (PI–LL) between groups 1 and 2. Linear correlation and regression analysis showed that there was no correlation between JOA score and the coronal Cobb angle in degenerative scoliosis patients. However, we found a positive correlation between JOA and LL. Our series of long lumbar fusions had a high complication and instrumentation failure. Creating adequate LL angle in harmony with PI was a key to prevent surgical complications and attain neurological improvement.