Background: We performed this randomized controlled study protocol to investigate the efficacy and adverse effects of furosemide vs torasemide in patients with heart failure (HF). Method: The present study was authorized by the local research ethics committee of Shanxi Cardiovascular Hospital (no. 48736645) and informed consent was obtained from all patients. Patients were enrolled in a consecutive prospective manner on a voluntary basis. Patients who were aged 18 years and older with HF who were eligible to enroll in this randomized trial. All patients had evidence of left ventricular systolic dysfunction, confirmed by echocardiographic or nuclear imaging. The exclusion criteria were left ventricular diastolic dysfunction only, or receipt of medical or pharmaceutical care in other health systems. The primary efficacy end point was the change in procollagen type I carboxyterminal peptide (PICP) serum levels between baseline and final visit. Secondary efficacy variables included parameters related to the clinical course of HF, such as body weight, presence of edema, signs and symptoms of HF, electrocardiogram and echocardiographic evaluation, amino-terminal pro brain-type natriuretic peptide (NT-proBNP) serum levels measured by ELISA method, systolic blood pressure (SBP), diastolic blood pressure (DBP), heart rate, and renal function. Results: One hundred patients who met the inclusion criteria were included in our study, Table 1 showed the effects of furosemide and torsemide on measures of clinical outcomes. Discussion: Fluid overload is the primary cause of hospitalization among patients with HF. Preventing circulatory congestion requires careful control of dietary sodium and chronic administration of loop diuretics. Torasemide and furosemide are representatives of loop diuretics with an identical diuretic mechanism, but different pharmacokinetic properties and additional effects. There is a need for reliable conclusion regarding the comparison of furosemide and torasemide in patients with HF. Several limitation should be noted:
Whether conventional hypothermic CPB induces myocyte apoptosis in dog hearts and modulation of bcl-2, bcl-xl, bax, bad, and caspase-3 pathways in this setting was investigated. Ten healthy adult dogs were randomized into sham-operated and CPB groups. Samples of left ventricle were obtained before, during and 3 h after CPB. In situ TUNEL was used to detect apoptotic myocytes. Immunohistochemistry and flow cytometry were employed for detection of expressions of bcl-2, bcl-xl, bax and bad proteins. Z-DEVD-AMC substrate cleavage and TBARS methods were used to measure the activity of caspase-3 and the content of lipid peroxide in LV myocardium, respectively. After CPB, the number of apoptotic myocytes in CPB group was significantly increased. The results of immunohistochemistry demonstrated that bcl-2, bcl-xl, bax and bad proteins were constitutionally present on the sarcolemma of the LV myocytes. FACS results showed that, after CPB, expressions of bax and bad in CPB group were significantly upregulated, while the expressions of bcl-2 and bcl-xl were not significantly changed in both groups. The activity of caspase-3 and the content of lipid peroxide in LV myocardium in CPB group were also significantly increased after CPB. The present study shows that there exists myocardiocyte apoptosis in dog hearts undergoing conventional hypothermic CPB and the myocyte apoptosis is initiated by ischemia and performed during reperfusion. Moreover, the CPB-induced myocyte apoptosis was associated with upregulation of expressions of bax and bad proteins, activation of caspase-3 and increase of oxidative stress.
ObjectiveTo analyze treatment strategies, prognosis, and related risk factors of patients with postinfarction ventricular septal rupture, as well as the impact of timing of surgical intervention.MethodsA total of 23 patients diagnosed with postinfarction ventricular septal rupture who were non-selectively admitted to Shanxi Provincial Cardiovascular Hospital between October 2017 and August 2021 were included in this study. The relevant clinical data, operation-related conditions, and follow-up data were summarized for all patients. The Kaplan-Meier method and log-rank test were used for the cumulative incidence of unadjusted mortality in patients with different treatment methods. Multivariate logistic regression was used to evaluate the independent risk factors for in-hospital patient mortality.ResultsThe mean age of the study patients was 64.43 ± 7.54 years, 12(52.2%) were females. There was a significant difference in terms of postoperative residual shunt between the surgical and interventional closure groups (5.9 vs. 100%, respectively; P < 0.001). The overall in-hospital mortality rate was 21.7%; however, even though the surgical group had a lower mortality rate than the interventional closure group (17.6 vs. 33%, respectively), this difference was not statistically significant (P = 0.576). Univariate analysis showed that in-hospital survival group patients were significantly younger than in-hospital death group patients (62.50 ± 6.53 vs. 71.40 ± 7.37 years, respectively; P = 0.016), and that women had a significantly higher in-hospital mortality rate than men (P = 0.037). The average postoperative follow-up time was 18.11 ± 13.92 months; as of the end of the study all 14 patients in the surgical group were alive, Two out of four patients survived and two patients died after interventional closure. Univariate analysis showed that interventional closure was a risk factor for long-term death (P < 0.05).ConclusionSurgical operation is the most effective treatment for patients with postinfarction ventricular septal rupture; however, the best timing of the operation should be based on the patient's condition and comprehensively determined through real-time evaluation and monitoring. We believe that delaying the operation time as much as possible when the patient's condition permits can reduce postoperative mortality. Interventional closure can be used as a supplementary or bridge treatment for surgical procedures.
in recent years, with the continuous progress and development of science and technology and the increasingly mature medical technology, the diagnosis of coronary artery plaque is becoming more and more complex. In recent years, there are many challenges and obstacles in the development of scientific and medical treatment. In order to successfully break through these challenges and obstacles, we must establish a 64- layer spiral CT detection system and lymphocyte symptom response. This paper mainly introduces the design and study of the diagnostic value of 64 slice spiral CT combined detection of CD4 + CD28-T lymphocytes in peripheral blood of patients with coronary plaque. This paper uses 64 slice spiral CT to detect the value of peripheral blood CD4 + CD28-T lymphocytes in the diagnosis of coronary plaque. The main purpose of CT is to solve two problems: the shape, size, location and activity of coronary plaque; The influence of coronary plaque on vascular anatomy and physiology plays a guiding role in treatment. The motion of coronary plaque and its relationship with heart cavity, heart wall and valve mouth (such as whether the movement of coronary plaque causes obstruction of valve mouth, etc.) can be displayed by film scanning, and cardiac function can be calculated. The results show that the diagnostic value of combined detection of CD4 + CD28-T lymphocytes in peripheral blood of patients with 64 slice spiral CT makes the plaque treatment rate increase by 16%. The limitations of the design of 64 slice spiral CT are analyzed the research and summary will enrich the academic research results.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
customersupport@researchsolutions.com
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
Copyright © 2025 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.