Background: Patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) initially responding to tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) eventually develop resistance due to accumulating mutations in the EGFR and additional lesser investigated mechanisms such as the participation of the tumor microenvironment (TME).
Methods: Here, we examined the potential for MET inhibitor capmatinib for the treatment of osimertinib-resistant NSCLCs and normalizing the TME.
Results: We first established that HCC827 and H1975 cells showed increased resistance against osimertinib when co-cultured with CAFs isolated from osimertinib-resistant patients. Additionally, we showed that CAFs promoted epithelial-mesenchymal transition (EMT) and self-renewal ability in both HCC827 and H1975 cells. We subsequently found that both CAF-cultured HCC827 and H1975 showed a significantly higher expression of MET, Akt, Snail and IL-1β, which were associated with survival and inflammatory responses. These cells in turn, promoted the generation of CAFs from normal lung fibroblasts. Subsequently, we observed that the treatment of capmatinib resulted in the re-sensitization of CAF-co-cultured H1975 and HCC827 to osimertinib, in association with reduced EMT and self-renewal ability. MET-silencing experiment using siRNA supported the observations made with capmatinib while with a greater magnitude. MET-silenced cell exhibited a severely hindered expression of inflammatory markers, IL-1β and NF-κB; EMT markers, Snail and Vimentin, while increased E-cadherin. Finally, we demonstrated that the combination of capmatinib and osimertinib led to an increased tumor inhibition and significantly lower number of CAFs within the patient derived xenograft (PDX) model.
Conclusion: Taken together, our findings suggested that an increased MET/Akt/Snail signaling was induced between the NSCLC cells and their TME (CAFs), resulting in osimertinib resistance. Suppression of this pathway by capmatinib may bypass the EGFR activating mutation and overcomes osimertinib resistance by targeting both tumor cells and CAFs.
Glioma is the most common type of primary brain tumor. Treatment options for recurrent gliomas include surgery, chemotherapy, and radiation therapy, but the clinical outcome is usually limited. In recent years, circular RNAs have been found to play a vital role in several human cancers. Gene Expression Omnibus database was utilized to verify the differentially expressed circRNAs. Then we detected that the expression of circular RNA circHECTD1 was significantly increased. The expression and function of circHECDT1 has not yet been reported in glioma. Then we confirmed that the level of circHECTD1 was significantly increased both in glioma tissues and cell lines, which is negatively correlated with the overall survival of patients. Knockdown of circHECTD1 inhibited proliferation and invasion in vitro, and also reduced the growth of tumor and prolonged the prognosis in vivo. Knockdown of circHECTD1 significantly elevated the miR‐296‐3p expression in LN229 and T98G cells. Luciferase reports and RNA immunoprecipitation data indicated that miR‐296‐3p was a direct target of circHECTD1 and that the miR‐296‐3p expression negatively regulated SLC10A7. Rescue experiments showed that the overexpression of SLC10A7 could impede the effects of circHECTD1 silencing on the proliferation and invasion of glioma cells. In this study, we identified that circHECTD1 regulates SLC10A7 by interacting with miR‐296‐3p in glioma cells. In conclusion, this study investigated a novel biomarker panel consisting of the circHECTD1/miR‐296‐3p/SLC10A7 axis, which is critical for glioma tumorigenesis and invasiveness and may represent a novel therapeutic target for intervening in glioma progression.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.