The sentinel lymph node (SLN) is the first node in a nodal basin to receive the direct lymphatic flow from a malignant melanoma. However, in some patients, lymphoscintigraphic study reveals the presence of lymphatic nodes in the area between the primary melanoma and the regional basin. These nodes are called "in-transit nodes" or "interval nodes" and, by definition, are also SLNs. The purpose of this study was to determine the incidence and location of in-transit SLNs in patients with malignant melanoma and to assess whether it is really necessary to harvest them. The evaluation involved 600 consecutive malignant melanoma patients. Lymphoscintigraphy was performed on the day before surgery following intradermal injection of 74-111 MBq of (99m)Tc-nanocolloid in four doses around the primary melanoma or the biopsy scar. Dynamic and static images were obtained and revealed SLNs in 599 out of 600 patients. The SLN was intraoperatively identified with the aid of patent blue dye and a hand-held gamma probe. Lymphoscintigraphy showed in-transit SLNs in 59/599 patients (9.8%). During surgery, all these in-transit SLNs were harvested, with those in the popliteal and epitrochlear regions being the most difficult to identify and excise. Metastatic cell deposits were subsequently identified in ten (16.9%) of these in-transit SLNs. In conclusion, lymphoscintigraphy has a key role in the identification of in-transit SLNs. Although the incidence of these nodes is relatively low in malignant melanoma patients, such SLNs present metastatic deposits in a significant percentage of cases and therefore the identification of in-transit SLNs in these patients is really necessary.

Our results support the use of liver uptake as an indicator in the qualitative evaluation of interim PET, or a ΔSUVmax greater than 75 % in semiquantitative analysis. Interim PET may predict PFS and OS and could be considered in the prognostic evaluation of DLBCL.

99mTc-Sestamibi identifies the presence of hyperfunctioning autonomous parathyroid glands in patients with secondary hyperparathyroidism (SHP). The objectives of this study were: (i) to evaluate the interdependence between biochemical markers of SHP and 99mTc-Sestamibi uptake; and (ii) to determine whether 99mTc-Sestamibi uptake could be efficiently predicted by any combination of the former variables. Double-phase parathyroid 99mTc-Sestamibi uptake and total serum calcium, phosphorus, intact parathormone, 25-OH vitamin D and 1,25(OH) vitamin D determinations were performed simultaneously in 74 patients (36 female, 38 male) with SHP. Planar images of the neck and upper thorax were obtained in anterior view, 15 min (early phase) and 120 min (delayed phase) after the injection of 740 MBq of 99mTc-Sestamibi. In each patient, a final parathyroid/thyroid (P/T) activity index was obtained by adding the results of the P/T index of all parathyroid lesions. There was a significant correlation between intact parathormone levels and delayed 99mTc-Sestamibi uptake ( r=0.656; P<0.01). Of all the variables, intact parathormone was the only significant predictor of delayed 99Tc-Sestamibi uptake ( r=0.487; P<0.001). Calcium, phosphorus, vitamin D metabolites, age, gender, time spent on haemodialysis and cause of chronic renal failure displayed no significant correlation with 99mTc-Sestamibi uptake. It can be concluded that 99mTc-Sestamibi uptake is a potential predictor of parathyroid function in SHP patients. Hence, 99mTc-Sestamibi scintigraphy could be useful to assess parathyroid function and in the clinical follow-up of these patients.

No abstract

No abstract