This paper compares how a dc fault affects a multiterminal dc (MTdc) network depending on the HVDC transmission system topology. To this end, a six-step methodology is proposed for the selection of the necessary dc fault protection measures. The network consists of four voltage-source converters converters radially connected. The converters natural fault response to a dc fault for the different topologies is studied using dynamic simulation models. For clearing of the dc faults, four different dc breaker technologies are compared based on their fault interruption time, together with a current direction fault detection method. If necessary, the converters are reinforced with limiting reactors to decrease the peak value and rate of rise of the fault currents providing sufficient time for the breakers to isolate the fault without interrupting the MTdc network operation. The study shows that the symmetric monopolar topology is least affected by dc contingencies. Considering bipolar topologies, the bipolar with metallic return exhibits better fault response compared to the one with ground return. Topologies with ground or metallic return require full semiconductor or hybrid breakers with reactors to successfully isolate a dc fault.
Abstract -Although HVDC transmission systems have been available since mid-1950's, almost all installations worldwide are point-to-point systems. In the past, the lower reliability and higher costs of power electronic converters together with complex controls and need for fast telecommunication links may have prevented the construction of multi-terminal DC (MTDC) networks. The introduction of voltage-source converters for transmission purposes has renewed the interest in the development of supergrids for integration of remote renewable sources, such as offshore wind. The main focus of the present work is on the control and operation of MTDC networks for integration of offshore wind energy systems. After a brief introduction, the paper proposes a classification of MTDC networks. The most utilized control structures for VSC-HVDC are presented, since it is currently recognized as the best candidate for the development of supergrids, followed by a discussion of the merits and shortcomings of available DC voltage control methods. Subsequently, a novel control strategy -with distributed slack nodes -is proposed by means of a DC Optimal Power Flow. The distributed voltage control (DVC) strategy, is numerically illustrated by losses minimization in a MTDC network. Lastly, dynamic simulations are performed to demonstrate the benefits of the distributed voltage control strategy.
This paper presents the results of the second edition of the Wind Farm Layout Optimization Competition, which was held at the 22nd Genetic and Evolutionary Computation COnference (GECCO) in 2015. During this competition, competitors were tasked with optimizing the layouts of five generated wind farms based on a simplified cost of energy evaluation function of the wind farm layouts. Online and offline APIs were implemented in Cþþ, Java, Matlab and Python for this competition to offer a common framework for the competitors. The top four approaches out of eight participating teams are presented in this paper and their results are compared. All of the competitors' algorithms use evolutionary computation, the research field of the conference at which the competition was held. Competitors were able to downscale the optimization problem size (number of parameters) by casting the wind farm layout problem as a geometric optimization problem. This strongly reduces the number of evaluations (limited in the scope of this competition) with extremely promising results.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.