No abstract

No abstract

Objective This study aimed to evaluate the effect of artificial accelerated aging (AAA) on color stability, surface roughness, and microhardness of three laminate veneer (LV) materials. Materials and Methods Specimens of ceramic LV (CLV‐IPS E.max Press), hand‐layered composite LV (hand‐layered laminate veneer [HLV]‐Tetric N‐Ceram), and prefabricated composite LV (prefabricated laminate veneer [PLV]‐Componeer Coltene) were prepared as discs (n = 10). CIE L*, a*, and b* color coordinates, the Vickers microhardness, and surface roughness were measured 24 hours after preparation and reevaluated after aging for 300 hours in an ultraviolet (UV)‐AAA system (Ci35 Weather‐Ometer). Color difference (CIEDE2000 [ΔE00]) was calculated. Data were statistically analyzed with the Shapiro‐Wilk test and the Kruskall‐Wallis test followed by the Mann‐Whitney U tests (α = .05). Results All of the LV groups showed significant differences in ΔE00 after AAA (P < .001). Comparing the color changes of the HLVs with the PLVs, no significant difference could be found (P = .705). There was a statistically significant difference in the means of changes in microhardness among the LVs materials (P < .001). The changes in surface roughness results showed a significant difference after AAA in all the LVs (P < .001). Conclusions Within the limitations of this in vitro study, the color stability, the microhardness, and surface roughness of tested LVs were influenced by AAA. Clinical significance The prefabricated composite LV system does not replace the individualized ceramic LV technique, but rather offers an alternative to hand‐layered LVs, which is delicate and time‐consuming technique.

No abstract

No abstract