No abstract

Author contributions M.K. co-designed and implemented the overall strategy for the creation of the knock-in fly lines, designed and implemented the bioassays, the RT-qPCR experiments and the RMO analysis, performed statistical analyses and co-wrote the manuscript. S.C.G. designed and implemented the overall strategy for the creation of the knock-in fly lines, prepared the sequence data and metadata for the phylogenetic analyses, co-designed all other experiments, and co-wrote the manuscript. F.S. performed the structural modelling and docking site analyses. J.N.P. performed the phylogenetic, ancestral state and co-evolutionary analyses. K.I.V. conducted crosses, genotyping, and feeding experiments, and co-designed the qPCR experiments. J.M.A. and S.L.B. conducted crosses and genotyping, and feeding and sequestration experiments. A.P.H. performed the in vitro physiological experiments and sequestration analyses. T.M. conducted feeding experiments M.A. performed the RMO analysis with M.K., and conducted genotyping and feeding experiments. G.G. completed the RMO and ouabain dietary survival analyses. F.R. supervised the structural modelling and docking site analyses. S.D. oversaw and interpreted in vitro cell line analyses, helped to design the overall project and co-wrote the manuscript. A.A.A. helped to design the overall project, oversaw the in vitro physiological and sequestration experiments, and co-wrote the manuscript. N.K.W. led the overall collaboration, the project design and its integration, creation of fly lines and statistical analyses, and co-wrote the manuscript. Peer review information Nature thanks Joseph W. Thornton and the other, anonymous, reviewer(s) for their contribution to the peer review of this work.Online content Any methods, additional references, Nature Research reporting summaries, source data, extended data, supplementary information, acknowledgements, peer review information; details of author contributions and competing interests; and statements of data and code availability are available at

BackgroundVirus-induced deterrence to aphid feeding is believed to promote plant virus transmission by encouraging migration of virus-bearing insects away from infected plants. We investigated the effects of infection by an aphid-transmitted virus, cucumber mosaic virus (CMV), on the interaction of Arabidopsis thaliana, one of the natural hosts for CMV, with Myzus persicae (common names: ‘peach-potato aphid’, ‘green peach aphid’). Methodology/Principal FindingsInfection of Arabidopsis (ecotype Col-0) with CMV strain Fny (Fny-CMV) induced biosynthesis of the aphid feeding-deterrent 4-methoxy-indol-3-yl-methylglucosinolate (4MI3M). 4MI3M inhibited phloem ingestion by aphids and consequently discouraged aphid settling. The CMV 2b protein is a suppressor of antiviral RNA silencing, which has previously been implicated in altering plant-aphid interactions. Its presence in infected hosts enhances the accumulation of CMV and the other four viral proteins. Another viral gene product, the 2a protein (an RNA-dependent RNA polymerase), triggers defensive signaling, leading to increased 4MI3M accumulation. The 2b protein can inhibit ARGONAUTE1 (AGO1), a host factor that both positively-regulates 4MI3M biosynthesis and negatively-regulates accumulation of substance(s) toxic to aphids. However, the 1a replicase protein moderated 2b-mediated inhibition of AGO1, ensuring that aphids were deterred from feeding but not poisoned. The LS strain of CMV did not induce feeding deterrence in Arabidopsis ecotype Col-0. Conclusions/SignificanceInhibition of AGO1 by the 2b protein could act as a booby trap since this will trigger antibiosis against aphids. However, for Fny-CMV the interplay of three viral proteins (1a, 2a and 2b) appears to balance the need of the virus to inhibit antiviral silencing, while inducing a mild resistance (antixenosis) that is thought to promote transmission. The strain-specific effects of CMV on Arabidopsis-aphid interactions, and differences between the effects of Fny-CMV on this plant and those seen previously in tobacco (inhibition of resistance to aphids) may have important epidemiological consequences.

No abstract