A PTC platform is a feasible mechanism to engage patients in research programs such as biobanking. It is well supported by clinic staff and receives high engagement and acceptance from patients. Patient-approach rates vary in different clinics, likely due to both clinic and PTC process factors, but this strategy provides an efficient means of engaging patients in research and sets the stage for enhanced enrollment into translational research programs.

The average cohort size for tissue biospecimens used in cancer research studies has increased significantly over the last 20 years. To understand some of the factors behind changes in biospecimen use, we examined cancer research publications to characterize the relationship between specific assay techniques and biospecimen formats and products. We assessed a representative cross section of 378 publications in the journal Cancer Research that used tissue biospecimens, selected from 6 intervals between 1988 and 2010. Publications were categorized by biospecimen utilization, format type (Frozen, Formalin-Fixed Paraffin-Embedded, and Fresh), product type (RNA, DNA, Protein, Cells, and Metabolites), and types of research techniques performed. There was an increase in average biospecimen cohort size (p=0.001); relative use of Formalin-Fixed Paraffin-Embedded biospecimens (24%-68%, p<0.0001); and the proportion of techniques assaying RNA products from biospecimens (Frozen and Fresh formats, p<0.05), from 1988 to 2008. However, these trends have not continued and there has been no further increase from 2008 to 2010. While specific techniques such as 'tissue microarray' analysis appear to have driven some changes in format requirements, there is an overall trend towards techniques requiring RNA products across all formats of biospecimens in basic cancer research. Since pre-analytical variables influence gene expression (RNA levels) more than gene structure (DNA sequence), recognition of these research trends is important for biobanks when deciding priorities for the optimal preservation format and annotation of biospecimens.

The question of how best to attribute the unit costs of the annotated biospecimen product that is provided to a research user is a common issue for many biobanks. Some of the factors influencing user fees are capital and operating costs, internal and external demand and market competition, and moral standards that dictate that fees must have an ethical basis. It is therefore important to establish a transparent and accurate costing tool that can be utilized by biobanks and aid them in establishing biospecimen user fees. To address this issue, we built a biospecimen user fee calculator tool, accessible online at www.biobanking.org . The tool was built to allow input of: i) annual operating and capital costs; ii) costs categorized by the major core biobanking operations; iii) specimen products requested by a biobank user; and iv) services provided by the biobank beyond core operations (e.g., histology, tissue micro-array); as well as v) several user defined variables to allow the calculator to be adapted to different biobank operational designs. To establish default values for variables within the calculator, we first surveyed the members of the Canadian Tumour Repository Network (CTRNet) management committee. We then enrolled four different participants from CTRNet biobanks to test the hypothesis that the calculator tool could change approaches to user fees. Participants were first asked to estimate user fee pricing for three hypothetical user scenarios based on their biobanking experience (estimated pricing) and then to calculate fees for the same scenarios using the calculator tool (calculated pricing). Results demonstrated significant variation in estimated pricing that was reduced by calculated pricing, and that higher user fees are consistently derived when using the calculator. We conclude that adoption of this online calculator for user fee determination is an important first step towards harmonization and realistic user fees.

The consent process involves three steps; referral for contact, preliminary interview, and informed consent discussion. We propose that the efficiency and frequency of the consent process for individual biobank related projects increases when the referral for contact is conducted by an independent "Permission to Contact" (PTC) platform within a health research organization. A PTC platform established at our center in 2007 obtains "permission to be contacted about future cancer research" from approximately 1200 patients annually. With ethics board approval, the British Columbia (BC) Cancer Agency's Tumour Tissue Repository (TTR) deployed a post-procedure consent protocol designed to obtain initial referrals from the PTC platform. This protocol was initially deployed for breast and gastrointestinal (GI) cancer patients (48% of patients), and later expanded as an option for all patients. We examined the impact on biobank accrual over a 4-year period spanning implementation of the post-procedure protocol. Within the first 2 years, while deploying an existing pre-procedure consent protocol, the TTR received, on average, 38.5 referrals/month, and consented 36.5 patients/month. Over the next 24 months, referral and consent rates increased to 68.5/month and 45.6/month, respectively, while operating both pre-procedure and post-procedure protocols. This represents a significant increase in overall referrals (1.78 fold) and consented patients (1.25 fold). For breast and GI cancer patients, referrals and consents, increased even further (2.4 and 1.6 fold, respectively). Overall, the consented/declined/unknown decision rates in the first period were 95.3%/1.2%/3.5% (n=918 approached patients), while rates in the second period were 86%/2.3%/11.7% (n=1272 approached patients). Overall, consent process costs fell by 14% per case. Patient engagement can be positively influenced by connecting a biobank with a PTC platform enhancing efficiency in obtaining consent, which is a key determinant of tumor biobank costs.