Highlights Bacterial adhesion to the surface of dental materials play a significant role in infections. The factors that govern microbial attachment involves different types of physical-chemical interactions and biological processes. Studying bacterial adhesion makes it possible to understand the mechanisms involved in attachment and helps in the search for technologies that promote antibacterial surfaces.

Purpose. The objective of this systematic review is to compare results concerning the properties of adhesion, roughness, and hardness of dental liners obtained in the last ten years. Methods. Searches on the databases LILACS, PubMed/Medline, Web of Science, and Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews were supplemented with manual searches conducted between February and April of 2018. The inclusion criteria included experimental in vitro and in vivo, clinical, and laboratory studies on resilient and/or hard liners, assessment of hardness, roughness, and/or adhesion to the denture base, and physical/mechanical changes resulting from the disinfection process and changes in liners’ composition or application. Results. A total of 406 articles were identified and, from those, 44 are discussed. Twenty-four studies examined the bond strength, 13 surface roughness, and 19 the hardness. Of these 44 studies, 12 evaluated more than one property. Different substances were used in the attempt to improve adhesion. Considering roughness and hardness, the benefits of sealants have been tested, and the changes resulting from antimicrobial agents’ incorporation have been assessed. Conclusion. Adhesion to the prosthesis base is improved with surface treatments. Rough surfaces and changes in hardness compromise the material’s serviceability.

The objective of this in vitro study was to investigate the effect of nanostructured silver vanadate decorated with silver nanoparticles (AgVO 3 ) on antimicrobial activity, hardness, roughness, and adhesion of a soft denture liner. The antimicrobial efficacy of the Trusoft (Boswoth) liner incorporated with different concentrations of AgVO 3 against Enterococcus faecalis , Pseudomonas aeruginosa , Candida albicans , and Staphyloccocus aureus (n = 5) was evaluated by the agar diffusion method. Roughness, hardness, and adhesion properties were also evaluated. The data were analyzed by analysis of variance (ANOVA) and Tukey’s multiple comparison test with significance at the p < 0.05 level. At concentrations of 1 and 2.5%, AgVO 3 incorporation was effective only against E . faecalis , and at 5 and 10%, against E . faecalis , P . aeruginosa , and C . albicans . None of the concentrations was effective against S . aureus . A decrease in hardness was found for the 1, 2.5, and 10% AgVO 3 concentrations (p < 0.001) and at 5%, hardness was not affected. None of the concentrations affected the roughness of the material. A significant increase in tensile values was observed between the liner and heat-curing acrylic resin for 2.5% (p < 0.001) and 10% (p = 0.042) concentrations. AgVO 3 incorporation to a soft denture liner promoted antimicrobial activity against E . faecalis , P . aeruginosa , and C . albicans without affecting roughness, maintaining the hardness properties recommended for soft and extra soft liners, and improving the adhesion between the liner and the acrylic resin used for dentures.

No abstract

No abstract