Previously, we have validated a 4-drug phenotyping cocktail, the "Cooperstown cocktail," using caffeine (cytochrome p450 [CYP] 1A2, N-acetyltransferase-2 [NAT2], and xanthine oxidase [XO]), dextromethorphan (CYP2D6), omeprazole (CYP2C19), and intravenous midazolam (hepatic CYP3A). Data suggest that warfarin can be used as a safe and accurate biomarker for CYP2C9, and if warfarin is administered with vitamin K, the pharmacodynamic effect is ablated. Twelve subjects received the Cooperstown cocktail, warfarin plus vitamin K, and both sets of biomarkers (Cooperstown 5+1 cocktail) in a randomized crossover fashion. On the basis of log-transformed data and a paired t test, no significant difference was seen for S-warfarin area under the serum concentration-time curve from time 0 to infinity (P =.09), omeprazole metabolic ratio (P =.374), caffeine metabolic ratio (P =.169 for CYP1A2 activity), midazolam plasma clearance (P =.573), or dextromethorphan metabolic ratio (P =.747) with the Cooperstown cocktail, warfarin plus vitamin K alone, or the Cooperstown 5+1 cocktail. During drug administration, the only side effect was mild and short-lived sedation after intravenous midazolam administration. Phenotypic measurements were in concordance with the subject's CYP2C9, CYP2C19, and CYP2D6 genotypes. The Cooperstown 5+1 cocktail may be used to simultaneously assess the activities of CYP1A2, CYP2C9, CYP2C19, CYP2D6, CYP3A, NAT2, and XO.

Erythrocyte sedimentation rate can predict severe AP with a slightly inferior performance to CRP. Combined ESR and CRP at 24 hours can predict severe AP accurately.

Hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection is more frequent in veterans than in nonveterans. Up to 85% of HCV-infected veterans have psychiatric and/or substance use (SU) co-morbidities which, prior to the 2002 NIH Consensus Conference, were considered relative contraindications to antiviral therapy, assuming a poor adherence. With the objective of evaluating the validity of this assumption, we compared eligibility, completion and response to antiviral therapy in HCV-infected veterans with and without these comorbidities. Veterans who were anti-HCV-positive and had been seen at least once in the liver clinic (between October 1999 and June 2002) were identified through the CT-VAHCS database. Records were reviewed for patient demographics and status of liver disease, assessment of treatment eligibility, type of therapy, completion of therapy and virological response. Patients with active mental illness (MI) or SU were compared with those without these comorbidities (controls). Of 697 anti-HCV-positive-patients, 647 HCV-RNA-positive patients were included, 294 with MI/SA and 353 controls. Patient demographics, viral and liver disease characteristics were comparable between groups. Patients with MI/SA were considered ineligible for therapy more frequently (53%vs 39%, P < 0.001) and were treated less frequently (21%vs 28%, P = 0.03) than controls. However, completion of therapy (72%vs 59%) and sustained virological response (SVR) (20%vs 25%) did not differ significantly between groups. HCV-infected veterans with MI/SA are being offered therapy and treated less often than those without such co-morbidities, however therapy completion and SVR rates are similar, challenging the perception that adherence is poorer in this patient population.