Sistem pemasyarakatan bukan saja menjadikan narapidana sebagai objek, melainkan juga subjek atas kodratnya sebagai manusia. Sistem pemasyarakatan bertujuan untuk mengembalikan warga binaan pemasyarakatan sebagai warga yang baik di tengah masyarakat. Penelitian ini merupakan penelitian hukum empirik (empirical research). Penelitian dilakukan di Lembaga Pemasyarakatan Klas I Kota Makassar. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa pelaksanaan pemenuhan hak mendapatkan upah atau premi atas pekerjaan yang dilakukan oleh narapidana di Lapas Klas I Kota Makassar sudah dilaksanakan sesuai dengan Keputusan Menteri Kehakiman Nomor M.01-PP.02.01 Tahun 1990 terkait besaran upah yang diterima narapidana 50% sebagai insentif karya narapidana, 35% sebagai dana penunjang pembinaan narapidana, 15% disetor ke Kantor Kas Negara. Konsep ideal pemidanaan terhadap narapidana dengan metode pemberian pelatihan dan diperkerjakan dikombinasi dengan program asimilasi sekaligus memberikan pekerjaan yang layak bagi narapidana.

This study aims to examine and analyze the Judge’s application of imprisonment to kleptomaniacs based on Decision No. 574/Pid.B/2019/PN.Dps. This study uses a normative juridical research method. The data was collected using literature study techniques on primary, secondary, and tertiary legal materials. The collected legal material is then analyzed using qualitative data analysis methods with a statute approach and a case approach which will then conclude the object of the research. The results show that the Judge’s application of imprisonment to the accused is based on Decision No. 574/Pid.B/2019/PN.Dps was the right decision. In this case, the problem of kleptomania currently ongoing in court should be proven with a Psychiatric Visum et Repertum. While the Letter of Statement No. 01/II.MR/RSPI/2019 cannot be the basis for the implementation of eliminating punishment. To determine that a person has kleptomania must undergo a process of examination for a minimum of two weeks to three months. Therefore, it is recommended that investigators provide the opportunity or take the initiative to prove the suspect’s mental condition before being processed to the following legal proof stage. So no more accused who prove their status as kleptomaniacs using the letter of statement. The Judge is also recommended to decide by giving measures sanction to the accused if proven to have kleptomania to avoid the recurrence of the crime of theft in the future.

Southeast Asia has a geographical position that is very vulnerable to various forms of transnational crime. The Association of Southeast Asian Nations/ASEAN as a regional organization for countries in Southeast Asia has a role and responsibility to carry out the prevention and eradication of transnational organized crime in Southeast Asia. This paper aims to analyze the factors causing the occurrence of transnational organized crime in Southeast Asia, and to analyze the forms of regional cooperation in the prevention and eradication of transnational organized crime in Southeast Asia. This paper uses a normative research type, with a statutory and interpretation approach. The legal materials used are sourced from books, research reports, journals, and international legal instruments. The collected legal materials are then analyzed qualitatively. The results show that there are three main factors that cause transnational organized crime in Southeast Asia, the three factors are economic globalization, increasing heterogeneity of immigrants, and rapidly developing communication technology. ASEAN has an important role in actively participating in campaigning for the war against transnational organized crime, especially in the Southeast Asia region. Transnational crime was first discussed by ASEAN in 1997 which later gave birth to the ASEAN Declaration on Transnational Crime Manila, Philippines, 20 December 1997. In addition to encouraging its members to ratify the United Nations Convention on Transnational Organized Crime, 2000 and the promulgation of a number of regional instruments, regional cooperation is also the main key for ASEAN and its member countries in the prevention and eradication of transnational organized crime in Southeast Asia.

No abstract

Euthanasia is a topic that always invites debate, especially the conflict between respect for the right to human life and moral values, ethics, and the sanctity of life as a gift from God Almighty. The Netherlands and Belgium, as open and free countries, have accommodated euthanasia in their medical practices. This article provides a description of how the Netherlands and Belgium carry out their euthanasia practices and how Indonesia responds to the euthanasia issue, both in terms of legislation and the way of life of the Indonesian people. Meanwhile in Indonesia, euthanasia is not explicitly recognized in Indonesian law, but there are several regulations that can ensnare euthanasia perpetrators, for example in Articles 344 and 345 of the Old Criminal Code and Articles 461 and 462 of the New Criminal Code. The process of legislation and legal renewal, especially regarding euthanasia, must still be carried out based on Pancasila and the 1945 Constitution of the Republic of Indonesia, taking into account the religious and cultural norms prevailing in Indonesian society.Keywords: Euthanasia; Update; Indonesia. AbstrakEuthanasia merupakan topik yang selalu mengundang perdebatan khususnya pertentangan antara penghormatan terhadap hak hidup manusia dengan nilai moral, etika, dan kesucian hidup sebagai anugerah Tuhan Yang Maha Kuasa. Belanda dan Belgia sebagai negara yang terbuka dan cenderung bebas telah mengakomodir euthanasia dalam praktik kedokteran mereka. Artikel ini memberikan uraian bagaimana Belanda dan Belgia menjalankan praktik euthanasia meraka dan seperti apa Indonesia dalam menyikapi isu euthanasia baik dalam perundang-undangan maupun pandangan hidup masyarakat Indonesia. jenis penelitian yang digunakan adalah normatif melalui pendekatan kasus, pendekatan perundang-undangan, pendekatan konsep serta pendekatan perbandingan.Sementara itu di Indonesia, secara tegas euthanasia belum dikenal dalam hukum Indonesia, namun terdapat beberapa peraturan yang dapat menjerat pelaku euthanasia misalnya dalam Pasal 344 dan Pasal 345 KUHP Lama serta Pasal 461 dan Pasal 462 KUHP Baru. Proses legislasi dan pembaruan hukum khususnya menyangkut euthanasia masih harus terus dilakukan dengan mendasarkan pada Pancasila dan UUD NRI 1945 dengan mempertimbangkan norma-norma agama maupun budaya yang berlaku di masyarakat Indonesia.Kata Kunci: Euthanasia; Pembaruan; Indonesia.