Background:
Periapical granuloma, radicular cyst, and periapical abscess represent periapical changes of frequent occurrence. Addressing this diagnostic dilemma is a matter of great concern, as it aids in governing the treatment planning and predicting its outcome.
Aim:
To evaluate the comparative accuracy of ultrasonography (USG), intraoral periapical (IOPA) radiography, and cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) in differentially diagnosing periapical lesions of endodontic origin.
Methods:
Thirty-five patients having periapical lesions associated with anterior teeth requiring endodontic therapy were included in the study. The lesions were analyzed using IOPA radiographs, CBCT scans, and USG with color Doppler (CD). Periapical surgery ensued and enucleated tissue samples were subjected to histopathological analysis. To evaluate the accuracy, diagnoses made by each of the three modalities were compared with the gold standard histopathological reports, and the diagnostic accuracy, sensitivity, and specificity of each were calculated.
Statistical Analysis:
Cohen kappa (κ) was used for interrater reliability, and Pearson's contingency coefficient (C) was used for correlating findings of USG with histopathology.
Results:
USG showed good concordance with histopathological findings (contingency coefficient: 0.664). It also showed a higher accuracy rate compared to IOPA radiography and CBCT in differentially diagnosing periapical lesions.
Conclusion:
USG with CD holds the potential to be used as a noninvasive adjunct in periapical diagnostics.
Removal of vital and necrotic remnants of pulp tissues, microorganisms, and microbial toxins from the root canal system is warranted for ensuing successful treatment outcome. Irrigation plays a major role in achieving the same. The last few years have seen a spurt in technological advances in various irrigant activation devices. This article meticulously reviews the various irrigant agitation systems available, which assists in complete disinfection of the complex root canal system.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.