Purpose Innovative, efficient treatments are desperately needed for people with glioblastoma (GBM). Methods Sixteen patients (median age 65.8 years) with newly diagnosed, small-sized, not safely resectable supratentorial GBM underwent interstitial photodynamic therapy (iPDT) as upfront eradicating local therapy followed by standard chemoradiation. 5-aminolevulinic acid (5-ALA) induced protoporphyrin IX was used as the photosensitizer. The tumors were irradiated with light at 635 nm wavelength via stereotactically implanted cylindrical diffuser fibers. Outcome after iPDT was retrospectively compared with a positively-selected in-house patient cohort (n = 110) who underwent complete tumor resection followed by chemoradiation. Results Median progression-free survival (PFS) was 16.4 months, and median overall survival (OS) was 28.0 months. Seven patients (43.8%) experienced long-term PFS > 24 months. Median follow-up was 113.9 months for the survivors. Univariate regression revealed MGMT-promoter methylation but not age as a prognostic factor for both OS (p = 0.04 and p = 0.07) and PFS (p = 0.04 and p = 0.67). Permanent iPDT-associated morbidity was seen in one iPDT patient (6.3%). Patients treated with iPDT experienced superior PFS and OS compared to patients who underwent complete tumor removal (p < 0.01 and p = 0.01, respectively). The rate of long-term PFS was higher in iPDT-treated patients (43.8% vs. 8.9%, p < 0.01). Conclusion iPDT is a feasible treatment concept and might be associated with long-term PFS in a subgroup of GBM patients, potentially via induction of so far unknown immunological tumor-controlling processes.

BackgroundAn integrated diagnosis consisting of histology and molecular markers is the basis of the current WHO classification system of gliomas. In patients with suspected newly diagnosed or recurrent glioma, stereotactic biopsy is an alternative in cases in which microsurgical resection is deemed to not be safely feasible or indicated. In this retrospective study, we aimed to analyze both the diagnostic yield and the safety of a standardized biopsy technique.Material and MethodsThe institutional database was screened for frame-based biopsy procedures (January 2016 until March 2021). Only patients with a suspected diagnosis of glioma based on imaging were included. All tumors were classified according to the current WHO grading system. The clinical parameters, procedural complications, histology, and molecular signature of the tissues obtained were assessed.ResultsBetween January 2016 and March 2021, 1,214 patients underwent a stereotactic biopsy: 617 (50.8%) for a newly diagnosed lesion and 597 (49.2%) for a suspected recurrence. The median age was 56.9 years (range 5 months−94.4 years). Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)-guidance was used in 99.3% of cases and additional positron emission tomography (PET)-guidance in 34.3% of cases. In total, stereotactic serial biopsy provided an integrated diagnosis in 96.3% of all procedures. The most frequent diagnoses were isocitrate dehydrogenase (IDH) wildtype glioblastoma (n = 596; 49.2%), oligodendroglioma grade 2 (n = 109; 9%), astrocytoma grade 3 (n = 108; 8.9%), oligodendroglioma grade 3 (n = 76; 6.3%), and astrocytoma grade 2 (n = 66; 5.4%). A detailed determination was successful for IDH 1/2 mutation in 99.4% of cases, for 1p/19q codeletion in 97.4% of cases, for TERT mutation in 98.9% of cases, and for MGMT promoter methylation in 99.1% of cases. Next-generation sequencing was evaluable in 64/67 (95.5%) of cases and DNA methylome analysis in 41/44 (93.2%) of cases. Thirteen (1.1%) cases showed glial tumors that could not be further specified. Seventy-three tumors were different non-glioma entities, e.g., of infectious or inflammatory nature. Seventy-five out of 597 suspected recurrences turned out to be post-therapeutic changes only. The rate of post-procedural complications with clinical symptoms of the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade 3 or higher was 1.2% in overall patients and 2.6% in the subgroup of brainstem biopsies. There was no fatal outcome in the entire series.ConclusionImage-guided stereotactic serial biopsy enables obtaining reliable histopathological and molecular diagnoses with a very low complication rate even in tumors with critical localization. Thus, in patients not undergoing microsurgical resection, this is a valuable tool for precision medicine of patients with glioma.

Introduction The role of chemotherapy alone in newly diagnosed WHO grade 2 oligodendroglioma after biopsy, incomplete or gross total resection remains controversial. We here analyze the clinical outcome of four patient cohorts being treated with either procarbazine, CCNU and vincristine (PCV) or temozolomide (TMZ) after biopsy, resection only, or wait-and-scan after biopsy. Methods Patients (n = 142) with molecularly defined oligodendroglioma (WHO 2016) were assigned to four cohorts: W&S, wait-and-scan after stereotactic biopsy (n = 59); RES, surgical resection only (n = 27); TMZ, temozolomide after biopsy (n = 26) or PCV (n = 30) after biopsy. Presurgical MRI T2 tumor volumes were obtained by manual segmentation. Progression-free survival (PFS), post-recurrence PFS (PR-PFS) and rate of histological progression to grade 3 were analyzed. Results PFS was longest after PCV (9.1 years), compared to 5.1 years after W&S, 4.4 years after RES and 3.6 years after TMZ. The rate of histological progression from grade 2 to 3 within 10 years was 9% for the PCV, 29% for the W&S, 67% for the RES and 75% for the TMZ group (p = 0.01). In the W&S group, patients treated with PCV at first relapse had a longer PFS from intervention than those treated with TMZ (7.2 vs 4.0 years, p = 0.04). Multivariate analysis identified smaller tumor volume prior to any intervention (p = 0.02) to be prognostic for PFS. Conclusions PCV chemotherapy alone is an effective treatment for WHO grade 2 oligodendroglioma, with long PFS and low rate of histological progression.

Purpose Glioblastoma is associated with especially poor outcome in the elderly. It is unclear if patients aged ≥80 years benefit from tumor-specific therapy as opposed to receiving best supportive care (BSC) only. Methods Patients with IDH-wildtype glioblastoma (WHO 2021), aged ≥80 years, and diagnosed by biopsy between 2010 and 2022 were included. Patient characteristics and clinical parameters were assessed. Uni- and multivariate analyses were performed. Results 76 patients with a median age of 82 (range 80–89) and a median initial KPS of 80 (range 50–90) were included. Tumor-specific therapy was initiated in 52 patients (68%). 22 patients (29%) received temozolomide monotherapy, 23 patients (30%) were treated with radiotherapy (RT) alone and 7 patients (9%) received combination therapies. In 24 patients (32%), tumor-specific therapy was omitted in lieu of BSC. Overall survival (OS) was longer in patients receiving tumor-specific therapy (5.4 vs. 3.3 months, p < 0.001). Molecular stratification showed that the survival benefit was owed to patients with MGMT promoter methylation (MGMTpos) who received tumor-specific therapy as opposed to BSC (6.2 vs. 2.6 months, p < 0.001), especially to those with better clinical status and no initial polypharmacy. Patients with unmethylated MGMT promoter (MGMTneg) did not benefit from tumor-specific therapy (3.6 vs. 3.7 months, p = 0.18). In multivariate analyses, better clinical status and MGMT promoter methylation were associated with prolonged survival (p < 0.01 and p = 0.01). Conclusion Benefit from tumor-specific treatment in patients with newly diagnosed glioblastoma aged ≥80 years might be restricted to MGMTpos patients, especially to those with good clinical status and no polypharmacy.

Purpose The role of temozolomide chemotherapy alone in isocitrate dehydrogenase (IDH)-mutant astrocytomas has not been conclusively determined. Radiotherapy might be superior to temozolomide. Recent studies have linked temozolomide with induction of hypermutation and poor clinical course in some IDH-mutant gliomas. Methods In this retrospective study, 183 patients with astrocytoma, IDH-mutant, CNS WHO grade 2 or 3 and diagnosed between 2001 and 2019 were included. Patients initially monitored by wait-and-scan strategies or treated with radiotherapy or temozolomide alone were studied. Patient data were correlated with outcome. Matched pair and subgroup analyses were conducted. Results Radiotherapy was associated with longer progression-free survival than temozolomide (6.2 vs 3.4 years, p = 0.02) and wait-and-scan strategies (6.2 vs 4 years, p = 0.03). Patients treated with radiotherapy lived longer than patients treated with temozolomide (14.4 vs 10.7 years, p = 0.02). Survival was longer in the wait-and-scan cohort than in the temozolomide cohort (not reached vs 10.7 years, p < 0.01). Patients from the wait-and-scan cohort receiving temozolomide at first progression had significantly shorter survival times than patients treated with any other therapy at first progression (p < 0.01). Post-surgical T2 tumor volume, contrast enhancement on MRI and WHO grade were associated with overall survival in univariate analyses (p < 0.01). ConclusionThe results suggest superiority of radiotherapy over temozolomide and wait-and-scan strategies regarding progression-free survival and superiority of radiotherapy over temozolomide regarding overall survival. Our results are consistent with the notion that early temozolomide might compromise outcome in some patients.