Solvation dynamics at the active site of an enzyme, glutaminyl-tRNA synthetase (GlnRS), was studied using a fluorescence probe, acrylodan, site-specifically attached at cysteine residue C229, near the active site. The picosecond time-dependent fluorescence Stokes shift indicates slow solvation dynamics at the active site of the enzyme, in the absence of any substrate. The solvation dynamics becomes still slower when the substrate (glutamine or tRNA(Gln)) binds to the enzyme. A mutant Y211H-GlnRS was constructed in which the glutamine binding site is disrupted. The mutant Y211H-GlnRS labeled at C229 with acrylodan exhibited significantly different solvent relaxation, thus demonstrating that the slow dynamics is indeed associated with the active site. Implications for catalysis and specificity have been discussed.

No abstract

Discrimination between cognate and non-cognate tRNAs by aminoacyl-tRNA synthetases occurs at several steps of the aminoacylation pathway. We have measured changes of solvation and counter-ion distribution at various steps of the aminoacylation pathway of glutamyl- and glutaminyl-tRNA synthetases. The decrease in the association constant with increasing KCl concentration is relatively small for cognate tRNA binding when compared to known DNA-protein interactions. The electro-neutral nature of the tRNA binding domain may be largely responsible for this low ion release stoichiometry, suggesting that a relatively large electrostatic component of the DNA-protein interaction free energy may have evolved for other purposes, such as, target search. Little change in solvation upon tRNA binding is seen. Non-cognate tRNA binding actually increases with increasing KCl concentration indicating that charge repulsion may be a significant component of binding free energy. Thus, electrostatic interactions may have been used to discriminate between cognate and non-cognate tRNAs in the binding step. The catalytic constant of glutaminyl-tRNA synthetase increases with increasing osmotic pressure indicating a water release of 8.4 +/- 1.4 mol/mol in the transition state, whereas little change is seen in the case of glutamyl-tRNA synthetase. We propose that the significant amount of water release in the transition state, in the case of glutaminyl-tRNA synthetase, is due to additional contact of the protein with the tRNA in the transition state.