IntroductionThere is paucity of data on sofosubvir (SOF)−based therapy in patients on maintenance hemodialysis (MHD). The objective of this report is to describe our experience using SOF-based direct antiviral agent (DAA) therapy in MHD patients in India.MethodsAll patients on MHD and treated with SOF-based therapy were included in this study. Before starting treatment, viral load, genotype, liver fibroscan, and upper gastrointestinal endoscopy were performed in all patients. SOF 400 mg/d or on an alternate day, ribavirin 200 mg/d and daclatasvir 60 mg/d were used in different regimens. Hepatitis C virus RNA was assessed at day 10 and at 4 weeks, at end of therapy, and at 12 weeks after stopping therapy.ResultsA total of 62 treatment-naïve patients were included. Mean age was 33.3 ± 10.2 years; 66% were men. Median number of copies were 106/dl. None had clinical evidence of cirrhosis. The most common genotype was genotype 1 in 64.5% of cases, followed by genotype 3 in 29% of cases. Thirty-nine patients were treated with SOF every other day/ribavirin, 2 patients with SOF daily/ribavirin, 6 with SOF every other day/daclatasvir, and 15 patients with SOF daily/daclatasvir. All patients were treated for 12 weeks. Fifty-nine (95.2%) patients had a sustained viral response (SVR). There was no impact of genotype on SVR. Twenty-three patients (37%) had complications while on therapy; 13 (20.3%) had dyspepsia, 4 had tuberculosis, and 3 had bacterial pneumonia. Most of the patients (n = 23; 56%) in the ribavirin group required an increase in the erythropoietin dose. No patient discontinued therapy due to complications.DiscussionSOF-based DAAs were well tolerated and efficacious in this cohort of patients on MHD.

BackgroundPersistent significant proteinuria has been associated with increased risk of progression to end-stage kidney disease in patients with idiopathic membranous nephropathy (IMN). Rituximab (RTX) therapy has given encouraging results in IMN, but most of the studies have used a higher dose, which is limited by the high cost as well as a potential increased risk of infections. Our study aimed to assess the efficacy and safety of low-dose RTX in patients with immunosuppression-resistant IMN.MethodsA total of 21 patients with treatment-resistant IMN treated with RTX from 2015 to 2016 at our center were included in the study. They received two doses of RTX (500 mg each) infusion 7 days apart. CD19 count was performed after 4 weeks. A single dose of RTX was repeated after 4–6 weeks if CD19 count was not depleted.ResultsThe mean standard deviation age of patients was 33.3 ± 12.3 years and 33.3% were females. Mean proteinuria before RTX therapy was 6.2 ± 2.2 g/day, serum creatinine was 0.9 ± 0.3 mg/dL and estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) was 95.8 ± 26.9 mL/min/1.73 m2. All the patients were non-responders to prior immunosuppressive treatment. Twenty (95.2%) patients achieved targeted CD19 depletion with two doses of RTX. One patient required one additional RTX dose due to inadequate B-cell suppression. A total of 13 (61.9%) patients achieved remission with RTX therapy: 4 (19.0%) complete and 9 (42.9%) partial remission. Patients who did not respond to RTX had a significantly lower baseline eGFR compared with those who achieved remission (P = 0.022). One patient developed respiratory tract infection following RTX during the follow-up, which responded to a course of oral antibiotics. During median follow-up of 13.1 (10–23.9) months, four (19%) patients had deterioration in renal function and one patient relapsed after achieving partial remission. Renal survival was significantly better in patients who responded to RTX therapy as compared with those who did not achieve remission (P = 0.0037).ConclusionLow-dose RTX therapy is effective and safe in immunosuppression-resistant IMN.

Background IgA nephropathy(IgAN) is a common glomerular disease with a higher risk of progression to end stage renal disease (ESRD) in certain ethnic populations. Since galactose deficient IgA1(Gd-IgA1) is a critical molecule in its pathogenesis, it has generated interest as a biomarker for this disease. Methods We measured serum Gd-IgA1 levels using a non- lectin based enzyme linked immunoassay(ELISA) in 136 immunosuppression naïve patients with primary IgAN and 110 controls(60-non IgA glomerular diseases, 50-healthy volunteers). Results Median serum Gd-IgA1 levels were significantly higher in IgAN patients [13135.6(2723.3,59603.8)ng/ml] compared to those with non IgA glomerular disease [4954.8(892.9,18256.2) ng/ml] and healthy controls [6299.5(1993.2,19256) ng/ml] and this was observed even after log transformation and adjustment for age and gender(p<0.0001). Considering a cut-off value of serum Gd-IGA1≥7982.1ng/ml, the sensitivity for diagnosing IgAN compared to healthy controls was 74.3% and specificity was 72.0% with a positive predictive value of 87.8% and negative predictive value of 50.7%. The serum Gd-IgA1 level did not co-relate with baseline estimated glomerular filtration rate, urine protein creatinine ratio and the M, E, S, T and C scores on renal biopsy. The renal survival (absence of >30% decrease in eGFR, ESRD or death) was lower in patients with higher serum Gd-IgA1 levels(≥7982ng/ml) than those who had lower levels but it was not statistically significant(p = 0.486). Conclusion Serum Gd-IgA1 level is higher in IgAN patients compared to non-IgA glomerular diseases and healthy controls and has a good positive predictive value for diagnosis. However, it does not correlate with clinical and histological characteristics of disease severity and does not predict disease progression.

Aim Pattern of kidney diseases varies across geographies due to multiple factors. There is a paucity of information from South Asia due to the absence of nationwide/regional biopsy registries. This study aimed to delineate the spectrum of renal parenchymal diseases in our region. Methods Records of kidney biopsies done in our nephrology department between 2006 and 2016 were analysed. Clinico‐pathological correlation was done from the available records. Results Of the 3275 biopsy evaluated, 61.9% were males, and mean age was 33.2 ± 14.2 years. 6.2% patients were elderly (age ≥ 60 years). Nephrotic syndrome (60.3%) was the commonest indication for biopsy. On histology, 73.0% patients had primary glomerulonephritis (GN), 15.5% secondary GN, 5.3% tubulo‐interstitial and 3.7% vascular disease. Focal segmental glomerulosclerosis (FSGS) was the commonest primary GN accounting for 18.2% of all GNs, followed by minimal change disease (16.8%), membranous nephropathy (MN) (16.0%) and IgA nephropathy (10.4%). Lupus nephritis (10.6%) and amyloidosis (3.7%) were the commonest secondary GN. The commonest cause of nephrotic syndrome was minimal change disease (22.9%), acute nephritic syndrome was lupus nephritis (30.6%), rapidly progressive renal failure was pauci‐immune crescentic GN (24.5%). IgA nephropathy was the commonest etiology of asymptomatic urinary abnormalities (26.3%) and gross haematuria (50%). About 60.9% patients of undetermined chronic kidney disease had glomerular diseases, and 13.6% had chronic tubulointerstitial nephritis. Lupus nephritis and acute cortical necrosis were significantly more common in females compared with males. Conclusion This is one of the largest cohorts of kidney biopsies from India, and it delineates the unique features and differences in the pattern of kidney disease in our population.

Renal transplant recipients are prone to a variety of infections due a persistent immunodepleted state. Incidence of tuberculosis in this population is much higher compared with the general population. While pulmonary tuberculosis still remains the commonest form in this population, renal allograft tuberculosis is very rare. We report two cases of isolated allograft tuberculosis and one case of allograft tuberculosis with coexistent pleuro-pulmonary and bone marrow involvement. All three cases had presented with pyrexia of unknown origin, wherein despite extensive investigations the cause was not found. In two cases the diagnosis was confirmed on histology. Two cases responded to non-rifampicin-based modified antitubercular treatment and one to conventional four-drug Rifampicin-based regimen. Graft function improved in two cases while in one case the graft was lost. Tuberculosis involving the renal allograft is a potential cause for graft dysfunction/loss and requires a high index of suspicion for diagnosis. Timely detection and early institution of therapy can help save the renal allograft.