No abstract

<p class="abstract"><strong>Background:</strong> Speech recognition in a modulating noise background can be facilitated by a process attributable to comodulation masking release (CMR). CMR is usually assumed to depend on comparisons of the outputs of different auditory filters. There was an immense importance to study to find the CMR effect in children with and without dyslexia.</p><p class="abstract"><strong>Methods:</strong> The study was to find the CMR effect in children with and without dyslexia. The current research was carried out through five steps i.e. auditory attention task stimuli preparation, auditory performance test, CMR stimuli preparation, CMR task and statistical analysis. Through these processes for measuring the CMR was done for the children with and without dyslexia. All the data were tabulated and statistically computed for the analysis of the data. SPSS software version 16 was used for the statistical analysis of the data.  </p><p class="abstract"><strong>Results:</strong> Independent t-test was used for the statistical analysis while the comparison between groups. Paired t- test was used for the statistical analysis while the comparison within the group at 95% confidence interval. These results indicated that the amount effect of CMR is greater in children with dyslexia. There was not a significant difference of CMR between the children with and without dyslexia to the effect of CMR was not significantly different between the ears in children without dyslexia and with dyslexia.</p><p class="abstract"><strong>Conclusions:</strong> The present study indicates that children with dyslexia have selective inability to use the temporal and spectral cues necessary for signal extraction in CMR.</p>

Introduction Dysarthria is a motor speech disorder.  It occurs due to paralysis, weakness, or incoordination of the speech musculature. The authors with this study want to enrich clinical understanding of the difference of the aerodynamic characteristics in normophonic and dysarthric population. Materials and method The aerodynamic characteristics in normophonics and in dysarthric population were compared and documented using Voice Function Analyzer (Aerophone II®). Forty male individuals within the age range of thirty five to fifty five years participated in this study. The control group   had twenty normophonic cases with no history of neurological disorder. The second group had twenty cases with dysarthria. Result Significant difference was found between the two groups in peak flow, forced volume and duration, vital capacity and fast adduction-abduction measurements. Discussion The difference in results from both the groups and their implications are discussed based on these findings. Conclusion The present study has assessed the parameters of speech and voice disorder in male dysarthric individuals. It suggests inclusion of aerodynamic measurement in test protocol and for evidence based research and prognosis documentation. Measurement of laryngeal or vocal tract resistance may be useful in documenting a variety of the perceptual voice characteristics.