With the increasing use of radiation therapy for treatment of canine sinonasal neoplasia, there is a need for developing low-dose CT protocols to help minimize radiation exposure. The purpose of this study was to assess the trade-off between image quality and reduced radiation exposure of a low-dose CT technique in the canine sinonasal cavity. In this prospective, experimental study, CT images of the sinonasal cavities from 10 normal Beagles were acquired using high-dose (130 kVp) or low-dose (110 kVp, 80 kVp) protocol. Radiation dose and image quality were compared. Radiation exposure measured by the volume-weighted CT dose index and dose-length product was reduced by 36% at 110 kVp and 74% at 80 kVp respectively, compared to the corresponding values at 130 kVp (P = 0.000). Low-dose protocol resulted in higher image noise and reduced signal-to-noise ratio and contrast-to-noise ratio than 130 kVp in most evaluated regions of interest (P < 0.05). CT numbers of the contrast-enhanced structures were highest at 80 kVp (P = 0.000). Conspicuity of most sinonasal structures was similar for high dose and both lower dose protocols. The results of this study indicate that 80 or 110 kVp can be used for sinonasal CT examinations to reduce radiation exposure to the patient without compromising image quality.

The beam characteristics of both machines are similar because of the same Agility TM MLC Model. We compared measured beam data calculated using the Elekta treatment planning system, Monaco ® , for each institute.Methods: Beam of the commissioning Elekta linear accelerator were measured in two independent institutes. After installing the beam model based on the measured beam data into the Monaco ® , Monte Carlo (MC) simulation data were generated, mimicking the beam data in a virtual water phantom. Measured beam data were compared with the calculated data, and their similarity was quantitatively evaluated by the gamma analysis.Results: We compared the percent depth dose (PDD) and off-axis profiles of 6 MV photon and 6MeV electron beams with MC calculation. With a 3%/3 mm gamma criterion, the photon PDD and profiles showed 100% gamma passing rates except for one inplane profile at 10 cm depth from VMTH. Gamma analysis of the measured photon beam off-axis profiles between the two institutes showed 100% agreement. The electron beams also indicated 100% agreement in PDD distributions. However, the gamma passing rates of the off-axis profiles were 91%-100% with a 3%/3 mm gamma criterion. Conclusions:The beam and their comparison with MC calculation for each institute showed good performance. Although the measuring tools were orthogonal, no significant difference was found.