Water floods are typically conducted using the least expensive, easily available, non-damaging brine. Very little attention is given to the possibility of changing brine composition to improve oil recovery. Over the last 20 years, there has been laboratory and field trial evidence that shows changing brine chemistry, especially to low salinity, can sometimes increase the recovery. The various mechanisms of additional oil recovery from changing brine chemistry are not entirely clear. We report here on the effect of using low salinity and divalent altered brines on oil recovery through a variety of laboratory methods and materials. More than twenty corefloods were conducted to evaluate the effect of brine chemistry and initial wettability on incremental oil recovery. We also performed phase behavior tests, contact angle measurements, and wettability index measurements to evaluate recovery mechanisms. Initial wettability of the core was altered by ageing it with different crude oil containing wide range of asphaltene content. The core flood with lowest wettability index (least water-wet) produced about 12% incremental recovery while the most water-wet core only produced ∼ 4% during the secondary low salinity waterflood.

Chevron injected emulsion polymer in the Captain field, offshore UK in the last decade at various scales (Poulsen et al., 2018). Pilot horizontal wells had exhibited faster than designed injectivity decline and Jackson et al. (2019) documented the causes to include oleic phase damage from a) injection of produced water containing crude oil after imperfect separation, and b) entrainment of injected emulsion polymer’s carrier oil. The wells were remediated with a surfactant stimulation package (Alexis et al., 2021; Dwarakanath et al., 2016). The remediation boosted the water relative permeability near wellbore which enhanced injectivity and allowed higher processing rates for subsequent continuous polymer injection. In this work, we conducted a set of core floods in slabs of surrogate rock of varying dimension and patterns to demonstrate the beneficial effect of near wellbore stimulation in the general case. 0.04 PV of the remediation package was injected and we show consistent injectivity enhancement across the experiments. We demonstrate the dominant effect of well skin treatment on the pressure drop profile compared to flow resistance from a) residual oil saturation and b) viscous fingering. The result is an important reminder for injectivity maintenance for high polymer flood processing rates for the life of the project. Clean injection fluids were demonstrated to maintain injectivity. We show applicability of stimulation for injectors into viscous oil reservoirs with adverse viscosity ratio. The robust nature of the remediation package developed by Alexis et al. (2021) is also shown, working to efficacy on viscous oil, as well as in situ phase separated polymer. We estimated skin and stimulation depth for a line drive case with low chemical dosage finding that 0.04 pore volumes of surfactant injection at 0.33 oil saturation units gave injectivity improvement of 31%. Surfactant stimulation is thus broadly applicable to wells with oleic phase skin.