Overlooked in the recent literatures on the enhancement of teacher professionalism and the changing role of school administrators is the task of rooting such newer ideas in a conceptual framework that would underwrite and give much needed coherence to these ideas. Despite redirections of some existing administrator education preparation programs that move away from emphasising “managerial/supervisory” aspects of school administration, the notion of principal, etc., as authoritarian leader is still ubiquitous in educational practice. The literature on teacher “empowerment,” however, suggests that there should be major, if not radical, changes to the roles and relationships of teachers and school administrators. Some researchers of teacher empowerment issues and school administration have argued that increasing democratic relations between teachers and administrators require that school administrators “should lead from behind” in bottom-up structures of decision making, while the more daring question the need for school administrators at all. This paper examines some of the issues involved. In arguing that both teachers and school administrators have role expectations grounded in a set of moral ideals and commitments external to their current and historic roles, we seek to advance the development of a framework that grounds and makes sense of the call for greater teacher autonomy and empowerment, while establishing the need for and authority of school administrators. In doing so, we attempt to show that educational authority is not an all or nothing, zero-sum, game, but that, because rooted in external ideals and commitments, it is something that requires shared professionalism between teachers and administrators. It is a shared professionalism that features different, but mutually supporting, realms of educational authority.
This paper describes an innovative professional preparation program in which preservice teachers and an intern principal came together during their field placements to share their experiences, notions of professionalism, and perspectives about education and schooling. The program had three objectives. The first was to help the participants explore and better understand the process of professional socialization and its relationship to organizational socialization. The second objective was to encourage the participants, through the use of reflection, to examine their own and each other's thinking about the educational profession and their developing roles within the profession. The third objective was to create an environment of “shared professionalism” in which the participants could work together as colearners and rethink the traditional hierarchical relationship between teachers and administrators. The research reported here focuses on the experiences and perspectives of the preservice principal as he completed his one year internships in a public elementary school.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.