Most gene mutations associated with Alzheimer's disease point to the metabolism of amyloid precursor protein as potential cause. The beta- and gamma-secretases are two executioners of amyloid precursor protein processing resulting in amyloid beta. Significant progress has been made in the selective inhibition of both proteases, regardless of structural information for gamma-secretase. Several peptidic and non-peptidic leads were identified and first drug candidates are in clinical trials. This review focuses on the developments since 2003.
Most gene mutations associated with Alzheimer’s disease point to the metabolism of amyloid precursor protein as a potential cause. The β- and γ-secretases are two executioners of amyloid precursor protein processing resulting in amyloid-β. Significant progress has been made in the selective inhibition of both proteases, regardless of structural information for γ-secretase. Several peptidic and nonpeptidic leads were identified for both targets.
BackgroundCD19. CAR T-cells for the treatment of relapsed and refractory (r/r) Diffuse Large B-Cell Lymphoma (DLBCL) demonstrated complete responses in 40%-58% of the patients. Recently, others could associate high tumor volume and low CAR T-cell expansion in vivo with poor outcome. We hypothesize, that the expansion and immunphenotype of (CAR) T cells in vivo determine treatment response and depend on patient- and disease associated factors.Materials and MethodsPatients with r/r DLBCL (n=34) were treated with either Axi-cel or Tisa-cel at the University Hospitals of Erlangen and Munich (LMU). The CAR T-cell product and peripheral blood were collected on day 0, 4, 7, 14, 30, 60 and 90 post transfusion. CAR T-cells were detected through flow cytometry utilizing a two step-staining with a biotinylated CD19 protein. Effector:Target (E:T) Ratios were estimated as absolute peak expansion of CAR T-cells (/ul) per tumorvolume (cm3). Responder (R, complete or partial remission) were compared to Non-Responder (NR, stable or progressive disease) according to response assessment with PET-CT three months after transfusion.ResultsCAR T-cell expansion peaked between day 7 and day 14 after transfusion with a greater expansion of CD8+compared to CD8- CAR T-cells on day 14 (59.27% vs 37.42%, p=0.021). The ratio of CD8+ and CD8- CAR T-cells did not differ between R and NR, however R exhibited higher E:T ratios of CD3+ CAR T-cells compared to NR (20.94 vs 12.81, p=0.015) and an increased E:T ratio of CD8+ CAR T-cells correlated with better progression-free survival (p=0.033). Interestingly, high CRP and ferritin levels at baseline were inversely associated with the E:T ratio (p=0.048 and p=0.017). CD3+ CAR T-cells of R showed earlier peak expression of PD-1 than NR (day 7 vs day 21). Further, peak expansion of CD3+ CAR T-cells correlated with higher PD-1 expression in R but not in NR (p=0.003 vs p=0.12). In addition, R revealed an increased relative frequency of effector memory differentiated CD3+ CAR T-cells (CCR7-CD45RA-, p=0.02), whereas CAR T-cells in NR showed an increased relative frequency of a naïve phenotype (CCR7+CD45RA+, p=0.001) on day 7 post infusion.ConclusionsFlow-based immunomonitoring with longitudinal characterization of CAR T-cells demonstrated a correlation of the E:T ratio with treatment response and survival. Increased inflammatory conditions at baseline correlated with diminished E:T ratios. Notably, in R CAR peak expansion was positively associated with higher PD-1 expression suggestive for superior CAR T-cell activation. In addition, greater memory differentiation was associated with efficacy during the time of peak expansion. Multiparameter analysis with other clinical covariates will show, whether CAR T-cell expansion and immunphenotypes can predict patient outcome.Disclosure InformationV. Blumenberg: B. Research Grant (principal investigator, collaborator or consultant and pending grants as well as grants already received); Significant; Novartis, Gilead Sciences, Janssen, BMS/Celgene. S. Völkl: None. G. Busch: None. S. Baumann: None. M. Winkelmann: None. B. Tast: None. D. Nixdorf: None. G. Hänel: None. L. Frölich: None. C. Schmidt: None. R. Jitschin: None. F. Vettermann: None. W. Kunz: None. D. Mougiakakos: None. M. von Bergwelt: None. V. Bücklein: None. A. Mackensen: None. M. Subklewe: None.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
customersupport@researchsolutions.com
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.