Imatinib mesylate (imatinib) is a new generation preparation that is now successfully used for treatment of cancer, particularly for chemotherapy of chronic myeloid leukemia (CML). Imatinib inhibits the activity of chimeric kinase BCR-ABL, which is responsible for the development of CML. The goal of this study was to investigate the role of a multidrug resistance protein, P-glycoprotein (Pgp), in the evolution of CML treated with imatinib. We demonstrate here that although imatinib is a substrate for Pgp, cultured CML cells (strain K562/i-S9), overexpressing active Pgp, do not exhibit imatinib resistance. Studies of CML patients in the accelerated phase have shown variations in the number of Pgp-positive cells (Pgp+) among individual patients treated with imatinib. During treatment of patients with imatinib for 6-12 months, the number of Pgp-positive cells significantly increased in most patients. The high number of Pgp+ cells remained in patients at least for 4.5 years and correlated with active Rhodamine 123 (Rh123) efflux. Such correlation was not found in the group of imatinib-resistant patients examined 35-60 months after onset of imatinib therapy: cells from the imatinib-resistant patients exhibited efficient Rh123 efflux irrespectively of Pgp expression. We also compared the mode of Rh123 efflux by cells from CML patients who underwent imatinib treatment for 6-24 months and the responsiveness of patients to this therapy. There were significant differences in survival of patients depending on the absence or the presence of Rh123 efflux. In addition to Pgp, patients' cells expressed other transport proteins of the ABC family. Our data suggest that treatment with imatinib causes selection of leukemic stem cells characterized by expression of Pgp and other ABC transporters.

Hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemoperfusion (HIPEC) is an established form of locoregional chemotherapy of peritoneum tumors. However, its efficacy and safety status remain a controversy, partially, due to scarce data on pharmacokinetics and toxicity profile of drugs under HIPEC. In the current study, 24 female Wistar rats were randomly assigned to receive cisplatin as HIPEC (n = 12, 20 mg/kg) or intravenously (i.v., n = 9, 4 mg/kg). The subgroups of three animals were used for the initial, intermediate, and late phases of the pharmacokinetic assessment. The animals were sacrificed on days 1 and 5. Blood, liver, kidney, and ovaries were evaluated for platinum content. Histological and immunohistochemical evaluation was undertaken in the liver and kidney. A trend for higher blood plasma platinum levels was observed for HIPEC compared to i.v. Significantly lower (p < 0.001) relative platinum binding to the proteins was observed in HIPEC animals compared to the i.v. administration. A five-fold higher concentration of cisplatin in HIPEC resulted in a ca. 2.5-fold increase in total blood platinum and ca. two-fold increase in blood ultrafitrable platinum (“free” Pt). Immunohistochemistry revealed higher kidney and liver damage after i.v. administration of cisplatin compared to HIPEC, although a five-fold higher dose of cisplatin was applied in HIPEC. Together with relatively lower absorption to the systemic circulation in HIPEC, higher protein binding is probably the primary reason for lower observed toxicity in HIPEC animals.

Introduction: The effects of chemotherapy are known to depend on the time of administration. Circadian rhythms are disturbed in tumors and in tumor bearers. Agents involved in controlling the circadian rhythms (chronobiotics) potentially can modify the outcomes of chemotherapeutics administered at different times of the day. Pineal hormone melatonin (MT) is a prototypic chronobiotic. Objective: The aim of the study was to investigate if MT can affect efficacy or toxicity of chemotherapy drugs administered at the extreme time points of the working day of hospital personnel. Methods: Cyclophosphamide, adriamycin, and 5-fluorouracil (CAF) and adriamycin and docetaxel (AT) cytotoxic drug combinations were administered on day 0 at 11:00 a.m. or at 5:00 p.m.

Aim: Alterations in circadian rhythms caused by tumor growth are thought to be clinically relevant as they affect the prognosis and treatment response. We aimed to evaluate the chronotherapeutic approach in rats with ovarian cancer receiving cisplatin intravenously (IV) or with hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemoperfusion (HIPEC) and to assess daily variations in tumor and intestinal epithelium proliferation. Methods: In the pilot study, we used 12 intact rats and 12 rats with transplantable ovarian cancer, which were euthanized at ZT0 (08:00, lights on), ZT6, ZT12 and ZT18. In the main study, we used 45 rats with transplantable ovarian cancer. Animals were randomized into five groups: control, HIPEC with cisplatin at ZT0 (08:00), HIPEC with cisplatin at ZT12 (20:00), IV cisplatin at ZT0 and IV cisplatin at ZT12. We assessed the proliferation rate of tumor and small intestinal epithelium, apoptosis in small intestinal epithelium, and levels of γ-H2AX (DNA damage/repair marker) in kidneys and liver. Survival was calculated in each group. Results: Ascitic ovarian cancer disrupted daily variations in intestinal epithelium proliferation and DNA damage/repair in rats. Ovarian carcinoma exhibited no daily variation in mitotic activity. In animals receiving IV cisplatin, massive cell damage in the renal medulla and cystic changes within renal tubules were observed, unlike in rats receiving HIPEC. Tumor mitotic activity was lower in morning-treated groups. The median survival of rats in the control group was 8.5 days (95% CI 6.0-22.0), in HIPEC at ZT0 40.5 days (95% CI 28.0-47.0, p<0.001) and in HIPEC at ZT12 32.0 days (95% CI 28.0-37.0, p<0.001). Conclusion:In a rat model, ovarian tumor growth disrupted daily variations in intestinal epithelium proliferation and caused genotoxic stress in tumor-free tissues. HIPEC with cisplatin at ZT0 had a better efficacy/toxicity profile than HIPEC with cisplatin at ZT12 and IV administration at both time points.

Background. Photodynamic Therapy is one of the treatment methods used in modern oncology. Evaluation of the efficacy in vivo of photosensitizers on tumor models is generally accepted, but the photodynamic  therapy technique in mice is not without drawbacks.The purpose of the study was evaluation of the efficacy of photodynamic therapy in mice with Ehrlich tumor model after subcutaneous and intracutaneous injection of tumor cells.Material and Methods. The study was conducted on BAL B/C mice of both sexes. Fotoditazin® and Radachlorin® were used as photosensitizers. For photoactivation, the Alod laser apparatus with a wavelength of 662 nm was used.Results. A comparison of photodynamic therapy with subcutaneous and intracutaneous localization of Ehrlich tumor was performed. It was shown that depending on the location and depth of inoculation of Ehrlich tumor, the pharmacokinetics (both the fluorescence intensity over time and the contrast ratio of the tumor/surrounding tissue) and pharmacodynamics (tumor growth inhibition, survival) of photosensitizers are significantly different. Higher contrast of the tumor/surrounding tissue is observed with intracutaneous localization of the tumor.Conclusion. A model with intracutaneous localization of Ehrlich tumor can be recommended for a primary assessment of efficacy; it allows the use of fewer animals in the experiment. When planning experiments to study photosensitizers and evaluating their results, the advantages and disadvantages of different methods for modeling tumors in mice should be taken into account.