No abstract

The cutaneous localization of intravenously injected preformed immune complexes was examined in C57B1/6J mice and the importance of complex size and antibody charge was assessed for deposition and persistence in cutaneous structures. After a single intravenous bolus, large-latticed complexes deposited transiently in an interstitial extravasated pattern, and persisted longer in a vascular pattern. Small-latticed complexes, prepared at 50 times antigen excess, did not deposit. When large-latticed complexes were prepared with reduced and alkylated antibodies, their vascular deposition was similar, but they did not localize in the interstitium due to decreased extravasation. Large-latticed complexes prepared with cationized antibodies deposited in a vascular and interstitial pattern as well as at the dermal-epidermal junction. Complexes prepared with anionized antibodies deposited comparable to unaltered complexes. Cutaneous deposition of circulating immune complexes in mice requires a large lattice. Circulating immune complexes formed with cationic antibodies deposit at the dermal-epidermal junction.

We have previously shown that cationic proteins localize to the dermal-epidermal junction (DEJ) after i.v. injection in experimental animals. In the present studies, cationized rabbit IgG was used as antigen for induction of chronic serum sickness in C57BL/6J mice over a period of 4 weeks. The formation of immune deposits was examined by immunofluorescence microscopy at weekly intervals during chronic antigen administration and at 7 weeks from the initiation of studies. Chronic administration of the cationized antigen led to immune complex deposits at the DEJ, while administration of the same antigen in native form did not lead to these deposits. Junctional immune deposits increased with higher doses of cationized antigen and paralleled renal extraglomular deposition in intensity, persistence, and morphology. Mice given cationized antigen also demonstrated vascular immune complex deposits without complement, while mice given native antigen had complement deposits and developed perivascular inflammation. No inflammation or complement deposition was detected at the DEJ in either group. Charge properties of circulating antigens are important in determining tissue sites of immune complex deposition and inflammation. Circulating cationic antigens can lead to immune deposits at the DEJ.