No abstract

Introduction: The aim of this study was to determine if any patterns of infection or bacterial resistance existed in critically ill polytrauma patients admitted to the intensive care unit (ICU) at the CM Johannesburg Academic Hospital (CMJAH). Methods: This was a prospective, single-center study of patient laboratory records of 73 critically injured polytrauma patients admitted to an ICU. The data collected from each patient, beginning with admission and extending until discharge from the ICU, included age, gender, admission hemoglobin levels, injury severity score, length of ICU stay, microbiological cultures and sensitivity (MCS), and types and numbers of surgical procedures. Results: Upon admission to the ICU, the injury severity score (ISS) was 40.86 (± 15.64). In total, 73.98% of the patients required the use of a ventilator during their ICU stay. The most prevalent organisms isolated from specimens were Pseudomonas aeruginosa (30.1%), Klebsiella species (25.7%), Acinetobacterbaumanni (16.4%), and Staphylococcus aureus (5.8%). Multi-drug resistance (MDR) was identified in 63% of patients, with Klebsiella (73.91%) and Pseudomonas (65.21%) occurring most frequently. Multivariate analysis showed MDR to be the only significant predictor associated with a higher risk for hospital mortality when age, gender, ventilation, duration of ICU stay, ISS score, and the number of surgeries undergone was taken into account. Conclusion: Critically ill polytrauma patients are at particularly high risk for Gram-negative sepsis.

No abstract

Background: Dressing of split-thickness skin graft donor sites can be traumatic for the patient. The most advanced and expensive dressings have been compared to the most basic of dressings, with little or no consensus and an unpersuasive level of evidence. We aimed to determine the efficacy of the locally manufactured non-adherent, hydroconductive Drawtex® dressing and compare it to our current standard-of-care dressing, a thin transparent polyurethane film, in the healing of split-thickness donor sites. Methods: This prospective, within-patient controlled study included 27 adult participants, each with two split-thickness skin donor sites. The 54 donor site wounds were compared with regard to time to re-epithelialisation, perceived pain and healed wound quality. Results: By day 5, complete healing of donor site wounds, defined as >90% of epithelialized surface, was significantly higher in the hydroconductive dressing group compared to the polyurethane film group (22.2% and 3.7%, respectively; p < 0.0001). The hydroconductive dressing-treated donor site wounds were significantly less painful at 24-hours, *A research report on the original work presented in this article has been approved in partial fulfilment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Medicine by the University of the Witwatersrand.