A new yellows disease of watercress (Nasturtium officinale) in Hawaii has symptoms of reduced leaf size, leaf yellowing and crinkling, and occasionally witches' brooms. This disease is found on all watercress farms on Oahu but has not yet been found on other Hawaiian islands. Watercress plants were tested for phytoplasma infection by polymerase chain reaction assays using phytoplasma-specific primers. Amplicons of the expected sizes were produced from all symptomatic plants but not from healthy plants raised from seed. Phylogenetic analysis of the 16S rRNA gene indicated that watercress yellows was caused by a phytoplasma in the aster yellows group, with sequence similarity to onion yellows from Japan. Six weed species collected from the vicinity of affected watercress farms, Amaranth sp., Eclipta prostrata, Emilia sonchifolia, Plantago major, Myriophyllum aquaticum and Sonchus oleraceus, were also determined to be hosts of this phytoplasma. Leafhoppers, identified as Macrosteles sp. (Hemiptera, Cicadellidae), collected from symptomatic watercress transmitted this phytoplasma to watercress, plantain and lettuce (Lactuca sativa) in greenhouse experiments.

Tomato yellow leaf curl disease, caused by the begomovirus Tomato yellow leaf curl virus (TYLCV; family Geminiviridae), is an economically important disease of tomato (Solanum lycopersicum L.) that can be very destructive in tropical and subtropical regions (1). In October 2009, tomato plants showing stunted new growth, interveinal chlorosis, and upward curling of leaf margins were reported by a residential gardener in Wailuku, on the island of Maui. Similar symptoms were observed in approximately 200 tomato plants at a University of Hawaii research farm in Poamoho, on the island of Oahu in November 2009. The similarity between these symptoms and those of tomato yellow leaf curl disease and the presence of whiteflies (Bemisia spp.), the vector of TYLCV, suggested the causal agent was a geminivirus such as TYLCV. Total nucleic acids were extracted from a tomato plant sample from Wailuku and Poamoho and used in a PCR assay with degenerate primers PAR1c715 and PAL1v1978 for geminivirus detection (4). The ~1.5-kbp amplicon expected to be produced from a geminivirus template was generated from the symptomatic tomato plant samples but not from a greenhouse-grown control tomato plant. The amplicons were cloned by the pGEM-T Easy vector (Promega, Madison, WI). Three clones from each sample were sequenced, revealing 97 to 99% nucleotide identity to TYLCV sequences in GenBank and a 98.9% nucleotide identity between the Wailuku (Accession No. GU322424) and Poamoho (Accession No. GU322423) isolates. A multiplex PCR assay for the detection and discrimination between the IL and Mld clades of TYLCV was also performed on these isolates (2). A ~0.8-kbp amplicon was generated from both isolates confirming the presence of TYLCV and their inclusion into the TYLCV-IL clade (2). Seven symptomatic and three asymptomatic tomato plant samples from Poamoho were tested for TYLCV using a squash-blot hybridization assay (3) utilizing a digoxigenin-labeled probe derived from the ~1.5-kbp PCR amplicon. All symptomatic tomato plants and one asymptomatic tomato plant were found to be infected with TYLCV. How the virus entered Hawaii and how long it has been present is unknown. The most plausible route is through infected plant material such as an asymptomatic alternative host rather than viruliferous whiteflies. It appears TYLCV is not a recent introduction into Hawaii since the Wailuku gardener observed similar disease symptoms for a few years before submitting samples for testing. In January 2010, TYLCV was also detected in two commercial tomato farms on Oahu, posing a serious threat to the state's $10 million annual tomato crop. References: (1) H. Czosnek and H. Laterrot. Arch. Virol. 142:1392, 1997. (2) P. Lefeuvre et al. J. Virol. Methods 144:165, 2007. (3) N. Navot et al. Phytopathology 79:562, 1989. (4) M. R. Rojas et al. Plant Dis. 77:340, 1993.

No abstract

Symptoms of leaf yellowing, reduced leaf size, and witches'-brooms have recently been observed affecting watercress (Nasturtium microphyllum Boen. × Rcbh.) in Hawaii. These symptoms are followed by the collapse of affected plants. This condition has led to 80 to 90% losses for one of the largest watercress farms on Oahu and is now affecting other watercress farms in the area. Nutritional deficiencies or toxicities, water salinity, and insect or mite feeding damage were investigated but could not be implicated in the etiology of this syndrome. Eighteen watercress plants with early yellowing or advanced symptoms and nine symptomless plants were analyzed for phytoplasma infection using polymerase chain reaction (PCR) assays with primer pairs P1/Tint or P1/P7 (4). Amplicons of the expected sizes were produced from all symptomatic plants, whereas no products were amplified from symptomless plants. Sequence analysis of the cloned PCR products confirmed their phytoplasma origin and indicated that the watercress was infected with a phytoplasma most similar to SAY (2), a severe strain of western aster yellows phytoplasma previously classified as a 16SrI-B group member (3). Leafhoppers collected from an affected watercress planting have been identified as the aster leafhopper (Macrosteles quadrilineatus Fbs.) This species is the most efficient vector of the aster yellows phytoplasma and had not been previously recorded in Hawaii. The only other phytoplasma disease known in Hawaii prior to this report is Dodonaea yellows (1), which affects one of the most common native plants (Dodonaea viscosa (L.) Jacq.) in dry upland forests on all the islands. Dodonaea yellows, however, has been attributed to an X-disease (16SrIII) group phytoplasma. The occurrence of an aster yellows group phytoplasma in watercress, a previously unrecorded host, and the presence of a very efficient vector, M. quadrilineatus, poses a serious threat to the production of other vegetable and floral crops in Hawaii. References: (1) W. Borth et al. Plant Dis. 79:1094, 1995. (2) C. Kuske and B. Kirkpatrick. Int. J. Syst. Bacteriol. 42:226, 1992. (3) I.-M. Lee et al. Int. J. Syst. Bacteriol. 48:1153, 1998. (4) C. Smart et al. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 62:2988, 1996.

No abstract