No abstract

Mildly deleterious mutation has been invoked as a leading explanation for a diverse array of observations in evolutionary genetics and molecular evolution and is thought to be a significant risk of extinction for small populations. However, much of the empirical evidence for the deleterious‐mutation process derives from studies of Drosophila melanogaster, some of which have been called into question. We review a broad array of data that collectively support the hypothesis that deleterious mutations arise in flies at rate of about one per individual per generation, with the average mutation decreasing fitness by about only 2% in the heterozygous state. Empirical evidence from microbes, plants, and several other animal species provide further support for the idea that most mutations have only mildly deleterious effects on fitness, and several other species appear to have genomic mutation rates that are of the order of magnitude observed in Drosophila. However, there is mounting evidence that some organisms have genomic deleterious mutation rates that are substantially lower than one per individual per generation. These lower rates may be at least partially reconciled with the Drosophila data by taking into consideration the number of germline cell divisions per generation. To fully resolve the existing controversy over the properties of spontaneous mutations, a number of issues need to be clarified. These include the form of the distribution of mutational effects and the extent to which this is modified by the environmental and genetic background and the contribution of basic biological features such as generation length and genome size to interspecific differences in the genomic mutation rate. Once such information is available, it should be possible to make a refined statement about the long‐term impact of mutation on the genetic integrity of human populations subject to relaxed selection resulting from modern medical procedures.

The evolutionary dynamics of recessive or slightly dominant lethal mutations in partially self-fertilizing plants are analyzed using two models. In the identity-equilibrium model, lethals occur at a finite number of unlinked loci among which genotype frequencies are independent in mature plants. In the Kondrashov model, lethals occur at an infinite number of unlinked loci with identity disequilibrium produced by partial selfing.If the genomic mutation rate to (nearly) recessive lethal alleles is sufficiently high, such that the mean number of lethals (or lethal equivalents) per mature plant maintained at equilibrium under complete outcrossing exceeds 10, selective interference among loci creates a sharp discontinuity in the mean number of lethals maintained as a function of the selling rate. Virtually no purging of the lethals occurs unless the selling rate closely approaches or exceeds a threshold selfing rate, at which there is a precipitous drop in the mean number oflethals maintained. Identity disequilibrium lowers the threshold selling rate by increasing the ratio of variance to mean number of lethaIs per plant, increasing the opportunity for selection. This theory helps to explain observations on plant species that display very high inbreeding depression despite intermediate selfing rates.

The evolutionary dynamics of recessive or slightly dominant lethal mutations in partially self-fertilizing plants are analyzed using two models. In the identity-equilibrium model, lethals occur at a finite number of unlinked loci among which genotype frequencies are independent in mature plants. In the Kondrashov model, lethals occur at an infinite number of unlinked loci with identity disequilibrium produced by partial selfing. If the genomic mutation rate to (nearly) recessive lethal alleles is sufficiently high, such that the mean number of lethals (or lethal equivalents) per mature plant maintained at equilibrium under complete outcrossing exceeds 10, selective interference among loci creates a sharp discontinuity in the mean number of lethals maintained as a function of the selfing rate. Virtually no purging of the lethals occurs unless the selfing rate closely approaches or exceeds a threshold selfing rate, at which there is a precipitous drop in the mean number of lethals maintained. Identity disequilibrium lowers the threshold selfing rate by increasing the ratio of variance to mean number of lethals per plant, increasing the opportunity for selection. This theory helps to explain observations on plant species that display very high inbreeding depression despite intermediate selfing rates.

There is a long-recognized association in plants between small stature and selfing, and large stature and outcrossing. Inbreeding depression is central to several hypotheses for this association, but differences in the evolutionary dynamics of inbreeding depression associated with differences in stature are rarely considered. Here, we propose and test the F model of plant mating system evolution, which assumes that the per-generation mutation rate of a plant is a function of the number of mitoses (F) that occur from zygote to gamete, and predicts fundamental differences between low-F (small-statured) and high-F (largestatured) plants in the outcomes of the joint evolution of outcrossing rate and inbreeding depression. Using a large dataset of published population genetic studies of angiosperms and conifers, we compute fitted values of inbreeding depression and deleterious mutation rates for small-and large-statured plants. Consistent with our F model, we find that populations of small-statured plants exhibit a range of mating systems, significantly lower mutation rates, and intermediate inbreeding depression, while large-statured plants exhibit very high mutation rates and the maximum inbreeding depression of unity. These results indicate that (i) inbred progeny typically observed in large-statured plant populations are completely lost prior to maturity in nearly all populations; (ii) evolutionary shifts from outcrossing to selfing are generally not possible in large-statured species, rather, large-statured species are more likely to evolve mating systems that avoid selfing such as self-incompatibility and dioecy; (iii) destabilization of the mating system-high selfing rate with high-inbreeding depression-might be a common occurrence in largestatured species; and (iv) large-statured species in fragmented populations might be at higher risk of extinction than previously thought. Our results help to unify and simplify a large and diverse field of research, and serve to emphasize the importance that developmental and genetic constraints play in the evolution of plant mating systems.