No abstract

ObjectivesTo study changes in the peer consultation practice of assessing assisted dying requests and its quality among trained ‘Life End Information Forum’ (LEIF) consultants in Belgium between 2008 and 2019.MethodsCross-sectional surveys conducted in 2008 (N=132) and 2019 (N=527) among all registered LEIF consultants.ResultsThe response rate was 75% in 2008 and 57% in 2019. In 2019 compared with 2008, more LEIF consultants were significantly less than 40 years old (25%/10%, p=0.006) and at least 60 years old (34%/20%, p=0.006). In their activities regarding assessments of assisted dying requests over 12 months, we found a significant increase in the number of patients who did not meet the substantive requirements for assisted dying in 2019 compared with 2008 (1–4 patients: 41.1 %/58.8%, p=0.020). In their most recent assessments of an assisted dying request, LEIF consultants in 2019 made significantly more assessments of patients aged 80 years or older than in 2008 (31%/9%, p<0.001), and significantly fewer assessments for patients with cancer (53%/70%, p=0.034). Regarding adherence to quality criteria for consultation, LEIF consultants discussed unbearable suffering (87%/65%, p=0.003) and alternative treatments (palliative: 48 %/13%, p<0.001; curative: 28%/5%, p=0.002) significantly more often with the attending physician.ConclusionsChanges in peer consultation practice and its quality among LEIF consultants likely reflect changes in assisted dying practice in general, as well as changes in LEIF consultations on more complex cases for which LEIF consultants’ expertise is required.

Physicians have been subject to increasing external control to improve their medical practice, and scholars have theorized extensively about their opposition to such control. However, little empirical attention has been paid to the views and reasoning that lie behind this opposition. An in-depth understanding is necessary for enhancing the effectiveness and efficiency of external controls, and continuous deep sedation until death (CDS) is an interesting case in this regard. This study aims to explore how physicians frame control measures for CDS. We conducted 47 semi-structured interviews with Belgian physicians in 2019. A qualitative framing analysis was performed to analyze their views and reasoning. This study reveals that physicians approach CDS practice and control measures with different emphases. Controlling by mechanisms of professional self-regulation and state governance are put forward as appropriate means to improve CDS practice. Policymakers should take into consideration physicians’ frames to develop sound control measures.